Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall problems

2009-10-23 Thread Thomas Bennett
This is what I use on all my clients: -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 9102 -j ACCEPT I had only one issue which was on one server and I couldn't connect. I moved the rule to the top of the list of rules and then I was able to connect. I usually use a separate rule for eac

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall problems

2009-10-23 Thread Terry L. Inzauro
Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I need some fresh eyes on this at the moment. I made this entry in the > firewall scripts of my Linux servers which will be running some > component of Bacula > > > > iptables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 9101:9103 >

Re: [Bacula-users] Firewall problems

2009-10-23 Thread Terry L. Inzauro
Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I need some fresh eyes on this at the moment. I made this entry in the > firewall scripts of my Linux servers which will be running some > component of Bacula > > > > iptables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 9101:9103 >

[Bacula-users] Firewall problems

2009-10-23 Thread Gabriel - IP Guys
Dear All, I need some fresh eyes on this at the moment. I made this entry in the firewall scripts of my Linux servers which will be running some component of Bacula iptables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 9101:9103 -j ACCEPT I will add the source directive when I'm