On Saturday 04 March 2006 09:30, Florian Daniel Otel wrote:
> On 3/4/06, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:17:06 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel"
> >
> > Thanks. Unfortunately, it looks pretty normal except for the error. I
> > think we need to get the error re
On 3/4/06, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:17:06 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel"
> Thanks. Unfortunately, it looks pretty normal except for the error. I think
> we need to get the error reporting fixed and try again.
That's exactly why I mentioned in a prev p
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:17:06 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
>
> --=_Part_15763_4943429.1141377426437
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Dis
On Friday 03 March 2006 17:08, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:35:42 +0100, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > said:
> >
> > On Thursday 02 March 2006 22:29, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:11:01 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel"
> > > > <[EMAIL PROT
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:35:42 +0100, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 22:29, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:11:01 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > >
> > > On 3/2/06, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 02 March 2006 22:29, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:11:01 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > On 3/2/06, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Cygwin shouldn't be involved here. I know that Kern uses Cygwin to
> > > buil
On 3/2/06, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:11:01 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel" <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > On 3/2/06, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Cygwin shouldn't be involved here. I know that Kern uses Cygwin to build
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:11:01 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> On 3/2/06, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Cygwin shouldn't be involved here. I know that Kern uses Cygwin to build
> > the
> > fd on Windows, but it can be done from DOS too and
On 3/2/06, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cygwin shouldn't be involved here. I know that Kern uses Cygwin to build the
> fd on Windows, but it can be done from DOS too and the bacula-fd.exe shouldn't
> depend on Cygwin's dll (if yours does, then that could explain things...).
A quic
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:01:08 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Frank,
>
> >
> > The Windows loopback interface is implemented poorly at best. I had luck
> > using
> > this kind of tunneling in Windows by explicitly specifying 127.0.0.1
> > instead of
> > lo
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:01:08PM +0100, Florian Daniel Otel wrote:
> Anyway, on a more practical note: Can you please specify which version
> of winbacula did you use when you managed in 127.0.0.1 ? Any other
> tricks I am missing on the Windows side ?
I got it working using 1.36, but I should
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 14:08:10 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Martin,
>
> Sorry for being maybe a bit too brief in my post, but I already
> mentioned (both in the post above and in my original mail) that
> reverse forwarding of ports 9101 and 9103 _does_work:
Frank,
>
> The Windows loopback interface is implemented poorly at best. I had luck
> using
> this kind of tunneling in Windows by explicitly specifying 127.0.0.1 instead
> of
> localhost.
I should have mentioned it before (I thought I did) but I've tried
that venue also: I tried specifying 12
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:17:17PM +, hikari wrote:
> Annoyingly you can't use a 127.0.0.0/8 IP on it though, you have to
> assign some other IP to it. Microsoft never seem to do anything the
> logical way. Why they couldn't just have installed the loopback
> device by default and assig
Frank Sweetser wrote:
> The Windows loopback interface is implemented poorly at best. I had luck
> using
> this kind of tunneling in Windows by explicitly specifying 127.0.0.1 instead
> of
> localhost.
There is actually a seperate Loopback Device you can install, it
shows as a physical
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:15:59AM +0100, Florian Daniel Otel wrote:
> In very short: The FD for winbacula works fine if the DIR specifies
> the SD as being located on a FQDN host but does NOT work if it is
> specified as "localhost" (that is reversed tunneled to the right
> hostname due to firwal
Martin,
Sorry for being maybe a bit too brief in my post, but I already
mentioned (both in the post above and in my original mail) that
reverse forwarding of ports 9101 and 9103 _does_work: That means that
1) yes, I can telnet to local host port 9101 and 9103 from a DOS
prompt 2) yes, I can trans
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:15:59 +0100, "Florian Daniel Otel" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Since I am receiving in private questions from others with similar
> experiences (below) I am forced to raise the same problem again (as
> decribed in detail at this posting)
>
> http://article.gma
Hello all,
Since I am receiving in private questions from others with similar
experiences (below) I am forced to raise the same problem again (as
decribed in detail at this posting)
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.bacula.user/21701/
In very short: The FD for winbacula works fine if the DIR
19 matches
Mail list logo
