Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-10 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 01/10/11 02:49, Marcin Krol wrote: Out of interest, which filesystem are you using on this volume? xfs, as always when dealing with lots of small files. But ... xfs is optimized for long streaming reads and writes. -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607,

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-10 Thread Marcin Krol
But ... xfs is optimized for long streaming reads and writes. The only reliable alternative for me is ext3 and its performance is unacceptable when handling directories with lots of small files. M. -- Gaining the

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-10 Thread Marcin Krol
Additionally, if the emailserver is using mdir format there are thousands (millions?) of tiny files and there's a fixed overhead in opening each file no matter what its size is - that results in slow speeds when handling lots of small files. I just sent small test job from my mail server - 15

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-10 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 01/10/11 09:40, Marcin Krol wrote: But ... xfs is optimized for long streaming reads and writes. The only reliable alternative for me is ext3 and its performance is unacceptable when handling directories with lots of small files. Have you tried jfs? -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-09 Thread Marcin Krol
Out of interest, which filesystem are you using on this volume? xfs, as always when dealing with lots of small files. M. -- Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-08 Thread Marcin Krol
Are you talking about a full backup or some other level? If it is not a full backup you will get low speed because bacula only is backing up the changed files and it takes a long time to go through a filesystem with many thousands of files to find out what files have changed. Both full and

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-08 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Both full and differential backup run with same speed. Going through filesystem shouldn't affect backup speed. Rsync (which I used for testing) is doing pretty much same job - compares checksum of each and every file and transfers it if its different. Its 50 times faster than Bacula doing

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Extremly slow backup

2011-01-07 Thread John Drescher
-- Forwarded message -- From: John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com Date: Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:12 AM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Extremly slow backup To: mail...@securitylabs.it mail...@securitylabs.it On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:22 AM, mail...@securitylabs.it mail...@securitylabs.it