Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-19 Thread Martin Simmons
On Thu, 19 May 2005 02:02:37 +0200, Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Arno Ryan LeBlanc wrote: Arno, thank you for your response. Here are our details: Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has ext2 partitions mounted (rw) Arno Ok, the

[Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-18 Thread Ryan LeBlanc
We are running tests with Bacula to see if it will work in our environment. So far, we are very impressed! We have, however, run into a small problem. We do a full backup of a folder, and all files are copied as expected. We then put a file into this folder. It, however is an old file with a

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-18 Thread Ryan LeBlanc
Arno, thank you for your response. Here are our details: Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has ext2 partitions mounted (rw) The client is running Windows XP, no special mount options, just windows default. NTFS format on the partition Arno Lehmann wrote:

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-18 Thread Arno Lehmann
Ryan LeBlanc wrote: Arno, thank you for your response. Here are our details: Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has ext2 partitions mounted (rw) Ok, the server doesn't matter here, I think. The client is running Windows XP, no special mount options, just windows