Martin Simmons wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:02:58 +, Damian Brasher said:
I think you might have to run the SD (and possibly the FD) at debug level 200
to collect info about what happens at the end of the job.
Ok, I have upgraded upgraded to 2.2.6 yesterday as I really need to be
up
Martin Simmons wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:02:58 +, Damian Brasher said:
Martin Simmons wrote:
Also, you could attach gdb to each daemon and run the gdb command
thread apply all bt
11th Nov
Martin Simmons wrote:
Also, you could attach gdb to each daemon and run the gdb command
thread apply all bt
11th Nov 07---
Have attached /sbin/bacual-dir /sbin/bacula-fd and /sbin/bacula-sd to
gdb, run the commands
and will now wait
Martin Simmons wrote:
Also, you could attach gdb to each daemon and run the gdb command
thread apply all bt
11th Nov 07---
Have attached /sbin/bacual-dir /sbin/bacula-fd and /sbin/bacula-sd to
gdb, run the commands
and will now wait
Martin Simmons wrote:
I would do it by running gdb and then issuing the attach command with the pid
of the bacula-dir/sd/fd that was started by service.
I'll let the system run as I have set out in previous post, last night's
run was without error...
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:41:54 +, Damian Brasher said:
Martin Simmons wrote:
Is it still transfering any data or does it just stop dead? If the data
transfer rate you see is the average then it could be the latter.
Looks like no data is transferred after the last file, however the
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:49:36 +, Damian Brasher said:
Hi List
I am using bacula version 2.2.5 and have a problem where a job, the
fourth out of five, just grinds to a halt right after the last file. The
job does not reach full completion and stalls. This job has been fine
for
Martin Simmons wrote:
Is it still transfering any data or does it just stop dead? If the data
transfer rate you see is the average then it could be the latter.
Looks like no data is transferred after the last file, however the rate
slowly reduces over
the span of a few hours.
If it stops
Damian Brasher wrote:
Martin Simmons wrote:
Is it still transfering any data or does it just stop dead? If the data
transfer rate you see is the average then it could be the latter.
Looks like no data is transferred after the last file, however the
rate slowly reduces over
the span of
