Re: [Bacula-users] LTO4 OK. LTO3 FAIL

2011-08-02 Thread Alan Brown
John Drescher wrote: I thought write compatibility for LTO only went back one generation. But read compatibility goes back 2 generations. I was correct: Those are minimum specifications - but noone has (yet) produced a drive which deviates from them.

[Bacula-users] LTO4 OK. LTO3 FAIL

2011-07-29 Thread rodrigobrim
We have purchase DELL TL2000 (AKA IBM 3573-TL) with two LTO5 drives (model ULT3580-HH5). Bacula runs perfectly, but LTO3 tapes don't. In fact, my problem is about the tape data element. If I do dd, or tar command, these message is show: root@ubuntu10.04:/dev# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/st0 bs=512

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO4 OK. LTO3 FAIL

2011-07-29 Thread John Drescher
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:58 AM, rodrigobrim bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote: We have purchase DELL TL2000 (AKA IBM 3573-TL) with two LTO5 drives (model ULT3580-HH5). Bacula runs perfectly, but LTO3 tapes don't. In fact, my problem is about the tape data element. If I do dd, or tar

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO4 OK. LTO3 FAIL

2011-07-29 Thread John Drescher
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 2:04 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:58 AM, rodrigobrim bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote: We have purchase DELL TL2000 (AKA IBM 3573-TL) with two LTO5 drives (model ULT3580-HH5). Bacula runs perfectly, but LTO3 tapes don't.

[Bacula-users] LTO4 OK. LTO3 FAIL

2011-07-29 Thread rodrigobrim
That's it! Thank you so much! Rodrigo Brim +-- |This was sent by rodrigob...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +--