> => > This is something I raised at least 2-3 years ago. There's been
no
> => > apparent interest in solving the issue and likely won't be until
> one of
> => > the developers encounters the problem.
>
> I'd like to see that supported, but it's not critical...and there are
> probably
> a huge num
In the message dated: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:47:41 +0100,
The pithy ruminations from Jesper Krogh on
were:
=> Alan Brown wrote:
=> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
=> >
=> >> Media type is completely arbitrary. If you want the new drive to be able
=> >> to share media with the old d
>
> Anyway, personally, I'd like to see Alans suggestions implemented, but
> neither I nor any of my customers has a setup where that would be
> needed... the original poster might think about how they could support
> development here :-)
>
Believe me, I'd love to support the development of Bacu
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
>> Media type is completely arbitrary. If you want the new drive to be able
>> to share media with the old drive, you should use the same media type.
>> If not, you should have them be different. It would be best if you could
>> ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 23.01.2009 15:03, Alan Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>>
>>> Media type is completely arbitrary. If you want the new drive to be able
>>> to share media with the old drive, you should use the
Hi,
23.01.2009 15:03, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
>> Media type is completely arbitrary. If you want the new drive to be able
>> to share media with the old drive, you should use the same media type.
>> If not, you should have them be different. It would be
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Media type is completely arbitrary. If you want the new drive to be able
> to share media with the old drive, you should use the same media type.
> If not, you should have them be different. It would be best if you could
> make a supported media type
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> We just added a new LTO4 drive to our Neo8000 with two existing LTO3
> drives. I thought I would just have to add the drive into the device
> section of the SD with a new Media Label and things would be set to go.
> Well, the di
We just added a new LTO4 drive to our Neo8000 with two existing LTO3
drives. I thought I would just have to add the drive into the device
section of the SD with a new Media Label and things would be set to go.
Well, the director wants to know what media type the SD is. I've created
a second SD bloc
On Jan 16, 2008 11:08 AM, Robert LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have a Neo8000 with 2 LTO-3 drives. We are looking into the possibility
> of adding 2 LTO-4 drives to it. Can Bacula handle two different types of
> drives in the same autochanger? I don't need the LTO-4 drives to read the
We have a Neo8000 with 2 LTO-3 drives. We are looking into the possibility
of adding 2 LTO-4 drives to it. Can Bacula handle two different types of
drives in the same autochanger? I don¹t need the LTO-4 drives to read the
LTO-3 tapes or anything.
Robert LeBlanc
Life Sciences Computer Support
Brigh
11 matches
Mail list logo
