[Bacula-users] Possible to downgrade sd/fd from 3.0 to 2.4?

2009-11-30 Thread Paul Binkley
Hi Folks, I hope someone can help. I have been using Bacula for a couple of months now running 2.4 on the director and all client daemons, and 3.0 for the storage daemon (my mistake). This has been working fine. The 3.0 file daemon isn't compatible with the 2.4 director, so I need to downgrade.

Re: [Bacula-users] Possible to downgrade sd/fd from 3.0 to 2.4?

2009-11-30 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Paul Binkley paul.bink...@ois.com wrote: Hi Folks, I hope someone can help. I have been using Bacula for a couple of months now running 2.4 on the director and all client daemons, and 3.0 for the storage daemon (my mistake). This has been working fine. The 3.0

Re: [Bacula-users] Possible to downgrade sd/fd from 3.0 to 2.4?

2009-11-30 Thread Paul Binkley
. *** -Original Message- From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 10:03 AM To: Paul Binkley Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Possible to downgrade sd/fd from 3.0 to 2.4? On Mon

Re: [Bacula-users] Possible to downgrade sd/fd from 3.0 to 2.4?

2009-11-30 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi, On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Paul Binkley wrote: I hope someone can help. I have been using Bacula for a couple of months now running 2.4 on the director and all client daemons, and 3.0 for the storage daemon (my mistake). This has been working fine. The 3.0 file daemon isn't compatible with the

Re: [Bacula-users] Possible to downgrade sd/fd from 3.0 to 2.4?

2009-11-30 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Binkley wrote: Do you think upgrading the director is a better solution over the long-term since the 3.0 director can talk to 2.4 clients? That's definitely the solution I would vote for. There are scripts and documentation available for