Re: [Bacula-users] PostgreSQL 9.0 - passes regresssion tests

2010-11-06 Thread Dan Langille
On 11/4/2010 12:42 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote: > On 11/4/10 9:19 AM, Dan Langille wrote: >> FYI, the latest svn version of Bacula passes the regression tests with >> PostgreSQL 9.0: >> >> http://regress.bacula.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=4916 > Why does the click-through report that it failed th

Re: [Bacula-users] PostgreSQL 9.0 - passes regresssion tests

2010-11-06 Thread Dan Langille
On 11/4/2010 12:42 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote: > On 11/4/10 9:19 AM, Dan Langille wrote: >> FYI, the latest svn version of Bacula passes the regression tests with >> PostgreSQL 9.0: >> >> http://regress.bacula.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=4916 > Why does the click-through report that it failed the

Re: [Bacula-users] PostgreSQL 9.0 - passes regresssion tests

2010-11-04 Thread Mehma Sarja
Why does the click-through report that it failed the test? http://regress.bacula.org/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=4916 Mehma === On 11/4/10 9:19 AM, Dan Langille wrote: > FYI, the latest svn version of Bacula passes the regression tests with > PostgreSQL 9.0: > >http://regress.bacula.org/b

[Bacula-users] PostgreSQL 9.0 - passes regresssion tests

2010-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
FYI, the latest svn version of Bacula passes the regression tests with PostgreSQL 9.0: http://regress.bacula.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=4916 -- Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/ -- The Next 800 Companies to Lead