Hallo bacula Mailinglist,
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
can't get bacula running.
Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
No SSL/TLS in use.
Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
can't get bacula running.
Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64
Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64
Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I
can't get bacula running.
Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blion jerome.bl...@free.fr wrote:
Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today
Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blionjerome.bl...@free.fr wrote:
Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit :
Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef:
I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of
it's Clients was
This rule is not the real truth.
I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
Director (and Storage)
That does not violate the rule I gave.
Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?
This rule has been told to us from the developers
On 4/20/2011 3:26 PM, John Drescher wrote:
This rule is not the real truth.
I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze)
Director (and Storage)
That does not violate the rule I gave.
Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ?
This rule has
On 21/04/2011 8:18 AM, Jérôme Blion wrote:
Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit :
[SNIP]
No but a simple rule. The server (director and storage) must be always =
client. Also the director must be the same version as the storage.
John
Hello,
This rule is not the real truth.
I'm
Be *very* aware of the vagaries of email clients, the line above from
John appaers to contain the phrase always = client, when his original
post contained always = client.
This is because somewhere in the chain something wrapped the
line at = and
so the was seen as being a quote
