[Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Ben Schmidt
Hallo bacula Mailinglist, I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I can't get bacula running. Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64 Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64 No SSL/TLS in use.

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef: I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I can't get bacula running. Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1 amd64 Client: FD: 5.0.2, debian 6.0 amd64

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Jérôme Blion
Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit : Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef: I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today and I can't get bacula running. Server: DIR: 2.2.6, SD: 2.2.6, SLES 10.1

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread John Drescher
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blion jerome.bl...@free.fr wrote: Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit : Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef: I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of it's Clients was replaced by a new Server with debian 6.0 today

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Jérôme Blion
Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit : On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Jérôme Blionjerome.bl...@free.fr wrote: Le 20/04/2011 16:01, Jeremy Maes a écrit : Op 20/04/2011 15:29, Ben Schmidt schreef: I'm running a bacula 2.2.6 on a old Server that's just working. One of it's Clients was

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread John Drescher
This rule is not the real truth. I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze) Director (and Storage) That does not violate the rule I gave. Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ? This rule has been told to us from the developers

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Steve Ellis
On 4/20/2011 3:26 PM, John Drescher wrote: This rule is not the real truth. I'm backing up a 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny) client on a 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze) Director (and Storage) That does not violate the rule I gave. Does the Bacula team plan to provide such compatibility matrix ? This rule has

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 21/04/2011 8:18 AM, Jérôme Blion wrote: Le 21/04/2011 00:05, John Drescher a écrit : [SNIP] No but a simple rule. The server (director and storage) must be always = client. Also the director must be the same version as the storage. John Hello, This rule is not the real truth. I'm

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem rejected Hello command with DIR 2.2.6 and FD 5.0.2

2011-04-20 Thread John Drescher
Be *very* aware of the vagaries of email clients, the line above from John appaers to contain the phrase always = client, when his original post contained always = client. This is because somewhere in the chain something wrapped the  line at = and so the was seen as being a quote