again takes
about 1 week...
Best,
Christian
-Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: Re: AW: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Datum: 2021-03-05T14:15:20+0100
Von: "Alan Brown"
An: "Christian Lehmann" , "Martin Simmons"
On 03/03/2021 10:42, C
On 03/03/2021 10:42, Christian Lehmann wrote:
> Dear Alan,
>
> no nothing defined under /etc/modprobe.d, but here is my stinit.def:
>
>
> # This file contains example definitions for different kinds of tape
> # devices.
> #
> # You can find some examples in /usr/share/doc/mt-st/examples.
> #
> #
#timeout=180
#long-timeout=11400
mode1 blocksize=0 density=0x58 compression=1 # native
mode2 blocksize=0 density=0x58 compression=0 # LTO
}
Best,
Christian
-Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Datum: 2021-03-02T16:52:11+0100
Von
-eom, right?
>
> Best,
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> -----Original-Nachricht-
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
> Datum: 2021-03-02T15:31:07+0100
> Von: "Martin Simmons"
> An: "Christian Lehmann"
>
&g
ve an idea, why maximum block size=128K is working, but
anything bigger isn't? This should not be connected with fast-eom, right?
Best,
Christian
-Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: Re: AW: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Datum: 2021-03-02T15:31:07+0100
Von: "
E IM_REP_EN
>
> Best,
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> -----Original-Nachricht-
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
> Datum: 2021-03-02T12:34:22+0100
> Von: "Martin Simmons"
> An: "Christian Lehmann&quo
EN
Best,
Christian
-Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: Re: AW: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Datum: 2021-03-02T12:34:22+0100
Von: "Martin Simmons"
An: "Christian Lehmann"
Hi Christian,
Yes, I think fast-eod will cause problems.
Please try (1)
sume this is not the problem here as the result of (1)
> correctly reports a block number. Am I right?
>
> Thank you very much in advance!
>
> Best,
>
> Christian
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Martin Simmons
> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2021 22:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Simmons
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2021 22:43
An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Yes, as Alan said, the driver is st.
It would be useful to try the mt eod test again, but fo
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2021 16:20
An: Heitor Faria ; Christian Lehmann
Cc: Martin Simmons ; bacula-users
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
On 25/02/2021 16:15, Heitor Faria wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
>>>> Spool Directory
, 26. Februar 2021 18:30
An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Am 23.02.2021 um 15:11 schrieb Christian Lehmann:
> I have a problem with a single LTO-5 Tape drive (Tandberg LTO-5 HH).
>
> I do backups spanning multi
Hello Alan,
pt., 26 lut 2021 o 16:06 Alan Brown napisał(a):
> bacula developers
> claiming "It's too hard to fix it"
>
>
You are very unfail with the above statement. Kern denied to fix this issue
as he claimed the lin_tape driver is not working properly according to the
standard. The "hard to
tandard tape driver, am I right?
>
> Any idea how to get to know what went wrong?
>
> If I use a previuosly written, but not full bacula tape (after stopping
> storage daemon and ejecting the tape).
>
> mt -f /dev/nst0 eod works fine and afterwards I also get the current block
Am 23.02.2021 um 15:11 schrieb Christian Lehmann:
> I have a problem with a single LTO-5 Tape drive (Tandberg LTO-5 HH).
>
> I do backups spanning multiple Tapes, changing them manually.
>
> So I configured the storage daemon that it is automatically pushing out
> the tape as soon as it is
On 26/02/2021 13:47, Martin Simmons wrote:
> If you do:
>
> lsscsi -d
>
> then it will print the major:minor device numbers after /dev/st0.
>
> Then:
>
> ls -l /sys/dev/*/${major}:${minor}/device/driver/
>
> might show the name of the driver (module).
It's simpler than that: showing /dev/st* or
On 25/02/2021 16:15, Heitor Faria wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
Spool Directory = /srv/ag_dudziak/bacula-spool/LTO-5-1M
Maximum Block Size = 128K
Where is the "control device" parameter?
Here's what an equivalent entry on my system
Device {
### library physical position -1,1
###
On 25/02/2021 16:01, Christian Lehmann wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> not sure how to answer your question as I do not understand it *sorry*
>
> How can I find out?
>
lsmod | grep st
lsmod | grep lin
These are kernel modules and they will not coexist in the same machine,
you need to use one or the
4e 2.13 /dev/sdb
> [1:0:0:0]diskATA Samsung SSD 850 2B6Q /dev/sdc
> [9:0:4:0]tapeTANDBERG LTO-5 HH Z629 /dev/st0
> srv-fs-de1:/var/log# find /sys | grep drivers.*9:0:4
> /sys/bus/scsi/drivers/st/9:0:4:0
>
> Best,
>
> Christian
>
# find /sys | grep drivers.*9:0:4
> /sys/bus/scsi/drivers/st/9:0:4:0
>
> Best,
>
> Christian
>
>
> -----Original-Nachricht-
> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
> Datum: 2021-02-24T12:42:33+0100
> Von: "Martin S
Hello Christian,
>>> Device {
>>> Name = LTO-5-128K
>>> Archive Device = /dev/nst0
>>> Device Type = Tape
>>> Media Type = LTO-5-128K
>>> Labelmedia = yes
>>> Random Access = no
>>> # AutomaticMount = no
>>> AutomaticMount = yes
>>> RemovableMedia = yes
>>> AlwaysOpen = yes
Hi Alan,
not sure how to answer your question as I do not understand it *sorry*
How can I find out?
Best,
Christian
-Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Datum: 2021-02-24T14:49:00+0100
Von: "Alan Brown"
An: "
,
Christian
-Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Datum: 2021-02-24T12:42:33+0100
Von: "Martin Simmons"
An: "Christian Lehmann"
That is a strange error. ERR=Erfolg (Success) means that ioctl returned
non-zero but
O-5-128K" (/dev/nst0): ERR=tape_dev.c:363 ioctl
>> MTIOCGET error on "LTO-5-128K" (/dev/nst0). ERR=Erfolg.
>> 23-Feb 15:14 fritzie15-sd JobId 14182: Marking Volume "LTO-5-Tape0004-128K"
>> in Error in Catalog.
>>
>>
28K"
> in Error in Catalog.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original-Nachricht-
> Betreff: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
> Datum: 2021-02-23T15:19:37+0100
> Von: "Christian Lehmann"
> An: "bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
ET error on "LTO-5-128K" (/dev/nst0). ERR=Erfolg.
23-Feb 15:14 fritzie15-sd JobId 14182: Marking Volume "LTO-5-Tape0004-128K"
in Error in Catalog.
-----Original-Nachricht-
Betreff: [Bacula-users] Problem with missing EOD/EOF on LTO-5 Tape
Datum: 2021-02-23T15:19:37
Hello everybody,
I have a problem with a single LTO-5 Tape drive (Tandberg LTO-5 HH).
I do backups spanning multiple Tapes, changing them manually.
So I configured the storage daemon that it is automatically pushing out the
tape as soon as it is full.
So my users (and me) can see this and load
26 matches
Mail list logo
