Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-06 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 04 March 2006 01:50, Scott Barninger wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 19:33 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows now. > > > > "If you want to build the Win32 binaries, you will need a Microsoft > > Visual C++ compiler (or Visual Stu

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-06 Thread Scott Barninger
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 19:33 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows now. > > "If you want to build the Win32 binaries, you will need a Microsoft > Visual C++ compiler (or Visual Studio)." > > Does that help? > See also README.win32 in sr

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-06 Thread Scott Barninger
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 19:33 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows now. > > "If you want to build the Win32 binaries, you will need a Microsoft > Visual C++ compiler (or Visual Studio)." > > Does that help? > I am getting ready to start

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-03 Thread Landon Fuller
Erich Prinz wrote: Super. That actually helps a ton. Thought I was losing my mind. I have VS Express and presume that will be sufficient for compiling sake. Looks like there are other pieces to the puzzle that need to happen and will check back in through the process. For VC++ Express-spec

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-03 Thread Erich Prinz
Super. That actually helps a ton. Thought I was losing my mind. I have VS Express and presume that will be sufficient for compiling sake. Looks like there are other pieces to the puzzle that need to happen and will check back in through the process. Thanks again, Erich On Mar 3, 2006, at

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-03 Thread Dan Langille
On 3 Mar 2006 at 19:34, Dan Langille wrote: > On 4 Mar 2006 at 0:32, hikari wrote: > > > Dan Langille wrote: > > > > > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows > > > now. > > > > > > > The documentation in the source tree still talks about using Cygwin > > to do an init

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-03 Thread Dan Langille
On 4 Mar 2006 at 0:32, hikari wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows now. > > > > The documentation in the source tree still talks about using Cygwin > to do an initial configure before using VC++ to do the compile. Do you have a URL

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-03 Thread Dan Langille
resent to both lists On 3 Mar 2006 at 17:27, Erich Prinz wrote: > I'm interested in compiling binanries for the win32 client. > > Reading through all the documentation has me totally confused and it > may be in part to Cygwin and the other in part to the fact I've never > compiled on a wintel

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-03 Thread hikari
Dan Langille wrote: > AFAIK, cygwin is no longer used. Everything is native Windows now. The documentation in the source tree still talks about using Cygwin to do an initial configure before using VC++ to do the compile. -- Chris Crowther ---

[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Win32 FD compile

2006-03-03 Thread Dan Langille
On 3 Mar 2006 at 17:27, Erich Prinz wrote: > I'm interested in compiling binanries for the win32 client. > > Reading through all the documentation has me totally confused and it > may be in part to Cygwin and the other in part to the fact I've never > compiled on a wintel box before. What are