Re: [Bacula-users] Re-assigning volumes from Scratch pool to other pools

2011-11-14 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 11/14/11 08:36, Win Htin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Alan Brown wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have all my new tapes/volumes assigned to Scratch pool. If I >>> understand correctly, if I have e.g. Full and Incremental pools >>> defined but no actual volumes assigned, each pool wil

Re: [Bacula-users] Re-assigning volumes from Scratch pool to other pools

2011-11-14 Thread Win Htin
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Alan Brown wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have all my new tapes/volumes assigned to Scratch pool. If I >> understand correctly, if I have e.g. Full and Incremental pools >> defined but no actual volumes assigned, each pool will, when required, >> pick up the volume fr

Re: [Bacula-users] Re-assigning volumes from Scratch pool to other pools

2011-11-14 Thread Alan Brown
Win Htin wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have all my new tapes/volumes assigned to Scratch pool. If I > understand correctly, if I have e.g. Full and Incremental pools > defined but no actual volumes assigned, each pool will, when required, > pick up the volume from Scratch and re-assign it to the respec

Re: [Bacula-users] Re-assigning volumes from Scratch pool to other pools

2011-11-11 Thread John Drescher
> I have all my new tapes/volumes assigned to Scratch pool. If I > understand correctly, if I have e.g. Full and Incremental pools > defined but no actual volumes assigned, each pool will, when required, > pick up the volume from Scratch and re-assign it to the respective > pool. If I recollect it

[Bacula-users] Re-assigning volumes from Scratch pool to other pools

2011-11-11 Thread Win Htin
Hi folks, I have all my new tapes/volumes assigned to Scratch pool. If I understand correctly, if I have e.g. Full and Incremental pools defined but no actual volumes assigned, each pool will, when required, pick up the volume from Scratch and re-assign it to the respective pool. If I recollect it