Re: [Bacula-users] Re - Restore failed - bacula-fd doesn't follow symbolic links

2012-08-14 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 20120810 om 17:04 schreef Davide Franco: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Rados aw Korzeniewski wrote: > > 2012/8/10 Davide Franco > > > Anyway, I'm still trying to figure out how can I enforce the file > > > daemon to follow symlinks on Linux filesystem. > > > > Bacula does not follow any s

[Bacula-users] Re - Restore failed - bacula-fd doesn't follow symbolic links

2012-08-10 Thread Davide Franco
Hello, this sounds good for me. It's exactly what I did to recover my data. I just had to figure out where my data were located and it worked fine. The issue I had was not due 'cause the file daemon doesn't follow symlinks indeed. Thanks for your feedback Regards Davide On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 a

Re: [Bacula-users] Re - Restore failed - bacula-fd doesn't follow symbolic links

2012-08-10 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2012/8/10 Davide Franco > > Anyway, I'm still trying to figure out how can I enforce the file > daemon to follow symlinks on Linux filesystem. > > Bacula does not follow any symbolic links. It just backups a symbolic link as a symbolic link no matter if it points to the file or directory.

[Bacula-users] Re - Restore failed - bacula-fd doesn't follow symbolic links

2012-08-10 Thread Davide Franco
Hello all, I've just found a way to fix the problem I have. It was dns resolution problem (see bacula logs below). Fatal error: Bad response to Storage command: wanted 2000 OK storage , got 2902 Bad storage Anyway, I'm still trying to figure out how can I enforce the file daemon to follow symlin