On Wednesday 2016-11-23 04:19:51 Gi Dot wrote:
> Thanks for the reply and sorry for the delayed response.
>
> I'm using the 'Recycle Current Volume' parameter and will run some test,
> will update here my findings. I'm pretty sure with 'Recycle Current
> Volume' bacula will still look for appendab
Thanks for the reply and sorry for the delayed response.
I'm using the 'Recycle Current Volume' parameter and will run some test,
will update here my findings. I'm pretty sure with 'Recycle Current Volume'
bacula will still look for appendable volume within the pool first before
recycling whatever
On Wednesday 2016-11-02 03:32:39 Gi Dot wrote:
> Yes, both parameters will honor the retention period.
>
> Sorry, I think I worded it wrongly in my first mail. What I meant was,
> for both parameters, bacula won't recyle either current or oldest
> volume if there is other appendable volume still a
Yes, both parameters will honor the retention period.
Sorry, I think I worded it wrongly in my first mail. What I meant was, for
both parameters, bacula won't recyle either current or oldest volume if
there is other appendable volume still available in the pool. I was just
wondering if this applie
On Monday 2016-10-31 10:21:37 Gi Dot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if I understand these 2 parameters correctly:
>
> Recycle Current Volume = yes
> Recycle current mounted volume in pool.
>
> Recycle Oldest Volume = yes
> Recycle oldest volume in pool.
>
> But, for both parameters, bacu
Hi all,
I'd like to know if I understand these 2 parameters correctly:
Recycle Current Volume = yes
Recycle current mounted volume in pool.
Recycle Oldest Volume = yes
Recycle oldest volume in pool.
But, for both parameters, bacula still won't recyle either current or
oldest volume if there is
