Re: [Bacula-users] Restores via bat version browser very slow.

2010-05-12 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On Wed, May 12, 2010 13:56, Richard Scobie wrote: I installed 3.0.3 a month or so prior to 5.0.0 being released, with a view to using bat for restores, as it made life much easier for commandline-phobes, and it performed very well. It was then updated to 5.0.1 and restores of anything more

Re: [Bacula-users] Restores via bat version browser very slow.

2010-05-12 Thread Richard Scobie
Gary R. Schmidt wrote: I think I'll hold off updating for a bit longer. Sigh. Another bat bug I have just discovered going from 3.0.3 to 5.0.2, is mounting tapes in an autochanger from the command window: bat output in console pane: mount Select Storage resource (1-3): Automatically

Re: [Bacula-users] Restores via bat version browser very slow.

2010-05-12 Thread Richard Scobie
Gary R. Schmidt wrote: I think I'll hold off updating for a bit longer. Sigh. I have just discovered the issue of bat being unusably slow restoring on 5.0.X is known about by the developers and is being worked on. Regards, Richard

[Bacula-users] Restores via bat version browser very slow.

2010-05-11 Thread Richard Scobie
I installed 3.0.3 a month or so prior to 5.0.0 being released, with a view to using bat for restores, as it made life much easier for commandline-phobes, and it performed very well. It was then updated to 5.0.1 and restores of anything more than a handfull of files became unusably slow. I