Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"

2012-05-28 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 28.05.2012 17:44, schrieb Alan Brown: > On 28/05/12 14:38, Sean Cardus wrote: > >>> Scanning the log it looks like the storage daemon decreases its >>> spool size limit every time a backup job crashes. The last time >>> it used the full 50 GB was here: >> >> I've been seeing exactly the same be

Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"

2012-05-28 Thread Alan Brown
On 28/05/12 14:38, Sean Cardus wrote: >> Scanning the log it looks like the storage daemon decreases its >> spool size limit every time a backup job crashes. The last time >> it used the full 50 GB was here: > > I've been seeing exactly the same behaviour here (CentOS 4.9, Bacula SD > 5.0.3) for

Re: [Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"

2012-05-28 Thread Sean Cardus
Hi, > On a Bacula installation with a CentOS 6.2 (64 bit) server > running Bacula 5.2.6 director and SD with an HP LTO3 autoloader > and backing up some twenty-odd machines of various platforms, > all the jobs report "User specified spool size reached" > much too early, currently after 1.45 GB ins

[Bacula-users] SD Bug "User specified spool size reached"

2012-05-11 Thread Tilman Schmidt
On a Bacula installation with a CentOS 6.2 (64 bit) server running Bacula 5.2.6 director and SD with an HP LTO3 autoloader and backing up some twenty-odd machines of various platforms, all the jobs report "User specified spool size reached" much too early, currently after 1.45 GB instead of the rea