Hello, I was wondering if someone could help me out with an issue.
I've been testing Bacula 5.0.3 and Vchanger for a few months now,
everything is working good and I hope to put this into production very
soon. For the past few months I have only been backing up a small
handful of machines, I'm
Excerpts from Mike Hobbs's message of Fri Jul 08 15:23:47 -0400 2011:
Hi Mike,
> Due to the amount of data and machines I'll be backing up, I can see
> that when the first of the month comes around, running all my level
> 0 (Full) backups is going to take a week or more. I'm concerned
> because
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:07:22 -0400, Ben Walton said:
>
> You can override priority for each job that uses the jobdefs on a
> job-by-job basis, but you'll also need to make multiple jobs per
> client (one for full, one for daily/differential) so that you can
> assign different priorities.
Do
Excerpts from Martin Simmons's message of Mon Jul 11 05:24:38 -0400 2011:
Hi Martin,
> > You can override priority for each job that uses the jobdefs on a
> > job-by-job basis, but you'll also need to make multiple jobs per
> > client (one for full, one for daily/differential) so that you can
> >
I personally found the built-in Priority system to be unsuitable for my
needs. I am instead using the (undocumented) feature that backups
are typically executed in the order that they are placed into the schedule.
So in my case, I have four different machines, and each machine gets a
full backup
On 07/11/2011 10:29 AM, hymie! wrote:
> However, I might suggest that, since Incremental/Differential backups
> depend on having a Full backup already completed, you have your
> priorities backwards. The Full backups, imho, should be given the higher
> priority than the incrementals.
Maybe I didn
On 07/14/11 16:04, Mike Hobbs wrote:
> On 07/11/2011 10:29 AM, hymie! wrote:
>> However, I might suggest that, since Incremental/Differential backups
>> depend on having a Full backup already completed, you have your
>> priorities backwards. The Full backups, imho, should be given the higher
>> pr
