Il 03/03/2011 18:05, Phil Stracchino ha scritto:
> On 03/03/11 09:52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
>>
>> Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 04.52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT ha scritto:
>>
>>> I have my director using an external raid device which exports its
>>> filesystem with nfs protocol as storag
Sean Clark writes:
> In my experience, slow performance like this (i.e. <5MB/s on at least
> 100Mb ethernet) usually turns out to be the client's fault.
> Compression seems to be a very common culprit. Try switching
> compression off completely and see how much of a difference that
> makes. The
On 03/03/2011 05:12 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> That was one of the choices. btrfs is still considered highly
> experimental at this point.
>
> John
Well, that's definitely true, though so far for me it's been more
reliable than one might think. (I did, just yesterday,
run into what appeared to be
>> Well, depending on what you consider "mainline".
What I meant by "mainline" was a filesystem that was considered stable
in the mainline kernel.
John
--
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This pap
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Sean Clark wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 03:21 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT
>> wrote:
> [...]
>>> So the poor throughput is given by software compression. I don't know what
>>> to choose in the speed vs space tradeo
On 03/03/2011 03:21 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT
> wrote:
[...]
>> So the poor throughput is given by software compression. I don't know what
>> to choose in the speed vs space tradeoff. Ideally the best option could be
>> compression on the
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
>
> Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 20.53, Alan Brown ha scritto:
>
>> Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the
>>> nfs overhead, because the despooling phase (o
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 20.53, Alan Brown ha scritto:
> Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the
>> nfs overhead, because the despooling phase (over nfs filsystem) has a
>> transfer rate of 7.3 MBps, so it's fine. I
(Dangit, that last reply was supposed to go to the list, not just the
sender of the email...let me try this again)
On 03/03/2011 12:40 PM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
> Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the
> nfs overhead, because the despooling phase (ove
Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
> Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the
> nfs overhead, because the despooling phase (over nfs filsystem) has a
> transfer rate of 7.3 MBps, so it's fine. Instead the first phase (bacula-fd
> -> bacula-sd) happens at 1.2 MBps
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 17.58, Alan Brown ha scritto:
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>> I made a try with this results
>>>
>>> JobId 7: Spooling data ...
>>> JobId 7: Job write elapsed time = 00:13:07, Transfer rate = 1.295 M
>>> Bytes/second
>>> JobId 7: Committing spooled data to Volume "F
On 3/3/2011 6:52 AM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
>
> JobId 7: Spooling data ...
> JobId 7: Job write elapsed time = 00:13:07, Transfer rate = 1.295 M
> Bytes/second
> JobId 7: Committing spooled data to Volume "FullVolume-0004". Despooling
> 1,021,072,888 bytes ...
> JobId 7: Despooling elapse
On 03/03/11 09:52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
>
> Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 04.52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT ha scritto:
>
>> I have my director using an external raid device which exports its
>> filesystem with nfs protocol as storage. I just ended my bacula
>> configuration and just l
John Drescher wrote:
> I made a try with this results
>>
>> JobId 7: Spooling data ...
>> JobId 7: Job write elapsed time = 00:13:07, Transfer rate = 1.295 M
>> Bytes/second
>> JobId 7: Committing spooled data to Volume "FullVolume-0004". Despooling
>> 1,021,072,888 bytes ...
>> JobId 7: Despool
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
>
> Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 04.52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT ha scritto:
>
>> I have my director using an external raid device which exports its
>> filesystem with nfs protocol as storage. I just ended my bacula
>> configuratio
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 04.52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT ha scritto:
> I have my director using an external raid device which exports its filesystem
> with nfs protocol as storage. I just ended my bacula configuration and just
> launched my first remote job. I have this in the report
>
>
I have my director using an external raid device which exports its filesystem
with nfs protocol as storage. I just ended my bacula configuration and just
launched my first remote job. I have this in the report
JobId 3: Job write elapsed time = 00:14:23, Transfer rate = 1.182 M Bytes/second
whic
17 matches
Mail list logo
