Il 03/03/2011 18:05, Phil Stracchino ha scritto:
On 03/03/11 09:52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 04.52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT ha scritto:
I have my director using an external raid device which exports its
filesystem with nfs protocol as storage. I just
Sean Clark smcl...@tamu.edu writes:
In my experience, slow performance like this (i.e. 5MB/s on at least
100Mb ethernet) usually turns out to be the client's fault.
Compression seems to be a very common culprit. Try switching
compression off completely and see how much of a difference that
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 04.52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT ha scritto:
I have my director using an external raid device which exports its filesystem
with nfs protocol as storage. I just ended my bacula configuration and just
launched my first remote job. I have this in the report
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT fa...@zenit.org wrote:
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 04.52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT ha scritto:
I have my director using an external raid device which exports its
filesystem with nfs protocol as storage. I just ended my bacula
John Drescher wrote:
I made a try with this results
JobId 7: Spooling data ...
JobId 7: Job write elapsed time = 00:13:07, Transfer rate = 1.295 M
Bytes/second
JobId 7: Committing spooled data to Volume FullVolume-0004. Despooling
1,021,072,888 bytes ...
JobId 7: Despooling elapsed time
On 03/03/11 09:52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 04.52, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT ha scritto:
I have my director using an external raid device which exports its
filesystem with nfs protocol as storage. I just ended my bacula
configuration and just launched
On 3/3/2011 6:52 AM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
JobId 7: Spooling data ...
JobId 7: Job write elapsed time = 00:13:07, Transfer rate = 1.295 M
Bytes/second
JobId 7: Committing spooled data to Volume FullVolume-0004. Despooling
1,021,072,888 bytes ...
JobId 7: Despooling elapsed time =
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 17.58, Alan Brown ha scritto:
John Drescher wrote:
I made a try with this results
JobId 7: Spooling data ...
JobId 7: Job write elapsed time = 00:13:07, Transfer rate = 1.295 M
Bytes/second
JobId 7: Committing spooled data to Volume FullVolume-0004.
Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the
nfs overhead, because the despooling phase (over nfs filsystem) has a
transfer rate of 7.3 MBps, so it's fine. Instead the first phase (bacula-fd
- bacula-sd) happens at 1.2 MBps
(Dangit, that last reply was supposed to go to the list, not just the
sender of the email...let me try this again)
On 03/03/2011 12:40 PM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the
nfs overhead, because the despooling phase (over
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 20.53, Alan Brown ha scritto:
Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the
nfs overhead, because the despooling phase (over nfs filsystem) has a
transfer rate of 7.3 MBps, so it's fine. Instead
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT fa...@zenit.org wrote:
Il giorno 03/mar/2011, alle ore 20.53, Alan Brown ha scritto:
Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:
Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the
nfs overhead, because the despooling phase
On 03/03/2011 03:21 PM, John Drescher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT fa...@zenit.org
wrote:
[...]
So the poor throughput is given by software compression. I don't know what
to choose in the speed vs space tradeoff. Ideally the best option could be
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Sean Clark smcl...@tamu.edu wrote:
On 03/03/2011 03:21 PM, John Drescher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT fa...@zenit.org
wrote:
[...]
So the poor throughput is given by software compression. I don't know what
to choose in the
Well, depending on what you consider mainline.
What I meant by mainline was a filesystem that was considered stable
in the mainline kernel.
John
--
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper
On 03/03/2011 05:12 PM, John Drescher wrote:
That was one of the choices. btrfs is still considered highly
experimental at this point.
John
Well, that's definitely true, though so far for me it's been more
reliable than one might think. (I did, just yesterday,
run into what appeared to be an
I have my director using an external raid device which exports its filesystem
with nfs protocol as storage. I just ended my bacula configuration and just
launched my first remote job. I have this in the report
JobId 3: Job write elapsed time = 00:14:23, Transfer rate = 1.182 M Bytes/second
17 matches
Mail list logo
