[Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2010-11-18 Thread Steve Thompson
Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.5, x86_64. Recently noticed a few "Software Compression: None" reports lately, affecting about 10% of my backup jobs, both large and small. Software compression is most definitely turned on. What is this telling me? Steve --

[Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-18 Thread Steve Thompson
Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.5, x86_64. I reported this back in November, to no comment. I have a lot of full backups that are reporting "Software Compression: None". Software compression is most definitely turned on. For example, all of my fileset definitions begin in a similar fashion to: FileSet

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-18 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/18/2011 4:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > > Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.5, x86_64. > > I reported this back in November, to no comment. I have a lot of full > backups that are reporting "Software Compression: None". Software > compression is most definitely turned on. For example, all of my fileset

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-18 Thread Kleber Leal
The use of AllowCompression=No on storage definition can override compression option on fileset. Kleber 2011/1/18 Dan Langille > On 1/18/2011 4:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > > > > Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.5, x86_64. > > > > I reported this back in November, to no comment. I have a lot of full >

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-19 Thread Steve Thompson
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Dan Langille wrote: > On 1/18/2011 4:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: >> > Whether software compression happens or not seems to be random. Anyone >> know why this is happening? > > There was a discussion this week about this. Add Signature to your options. I will certainly try t

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/19/2011 9:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Dan Langille wrote: > >> On 1/18/2011 4:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: Whether software compression happens or not seems to be random. Anyone >>> know why this is happening? >> >> There was a discussion this week about this. Add

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:47:32 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: > > On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Dan Langille wrote: > > > On 1/18/2011 4:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: > >> > Whether software compression happens or not seems to be random. Anyone > >> know why this is happening? > > > > There was a di

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Steve Thompson
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote: > It reports "None" if there were no files in the backup or if the compression > saved less than 0.5%, so it doesn't necessarily mean that it wasn't attempted. I understand that, but I have several file sets that, for a full backup level, sometimes give

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/20/2011 7:24 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> It reports "None" if there were no files in the backup or if the compression >> saved less than 0.5%, so it doesn't necessarily mean that it wasn't >> attempted. > > I understand that, but I have several

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Steve Thompson
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Dan Langille wrote: > On 1/20/2011 7:24 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote: >> >>> It reports "None" if there were no files in the backup or if the >>> compression >>> saved less than 0.5%, so it doesn't necessarily mean that it wasn't >>

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Steve Thompson
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Dan Langille wrote: > Time for new eyes. Post the job emails. One full backup completed. Here are the relevant definitions: Job { Name = "bear_data15" JobDefs = "defjob" Pool = Pool_bear_data15 Write Bootstrap = "/var/lib/bacula/bear_data15.bsr" Client = bear

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:53:54 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: > > FileSet { >Name = "bear_data15" >Include { > Options { >compression = GZIP >signature = MD5 >sparse = yes >noatime = yes > } > Options { >exclude = yes >w

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Steve Thompson
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote: > This will never compress -- the "default" Options clause needs to the last > one, but you have it as the first one. Yes, of course you are correct; thank you. And I've even read that in the documentation. And moving the default Options clause to the e

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Dan Langille
On Thu, January 20, 2011 10:35 am, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> This will never compress -- the "default" Options clause needs to the >> last >> one, but you have it as the first one. > > Yes, of course you are correct; thank you. And I've even read that

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-20 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/20/2011 12:35 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Thu, January 20, 2011 10:35 am, Steve Thompson wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote: >> >>> This will never compress -- the "default" Options clause needs to the >>> last >>> one, but y

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-21 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:35:44 -0500, Dan Langille said: > > On Thu, January 20, 2011 10:35 am, Steve Thompson wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > >> This will never compress -- the "default" Options clause needs to the > >> last > >> one, but you have it as the first o