Hi.
We've just upgraded our bacula-installation from 1.36 to 2.0 .. That worked
excellent.. I'm very impressed with the smooth transistion.
In the old installation we had transferrates around 30 MB/s (measured using
iptraf when bacula-fd was processing some big files) (never more, often
less).. a
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> The attached Tape is an LTO-3(Quantum PX506) with has a reported rate at 80
> MB/s (I havent tested this). The network is a gigabit network, which I can
> put around 600 mbit/s through using nc in both ends on some junk-files.
Is that "native" or "compre
On Wed, February 14, 2007 12:31 am, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Anyone who can tell if this is typical.. or where my bottleneck is in this
> system?
My LTO-3 jukebox setup is very similar to yours. My backup speeds as show
by "Rate:" in the log entries ranges from about 56KB/s to 27600KB/s,
depending
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>
>> The attached Tape is an LTO-3(Quantum PX506) with has a reported rate
>> at 80
>> MB/s (I havent tested this). The network is a gigabit network, which I
>> can
>> put around 600 mbit/s through using nc in both ends on some junk-file
