Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-19 Thread Raymond Burns Jr.
dly let you know > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *Josip Deanovic <djosip+n...@linuxpages.net> > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 14, 2016 7:53 AM > > > *To: *bacula-users@l

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-19 Thread Norbert Gomes
, I will gladly let you know > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> > for Windows 10 > > > > *From: *Josip Deanovic <mailto:djosip+n...@linuxpages.net> > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 14, 2016 7:53

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-19 Thread Raymond Burns Jr.
ve me more > information about Deduplication, I will gladly let you know > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *Josip Deanovic <djosip+n...@linuxpages.net> > *Sent: *Wednesday, December 14, 2016 7:

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-14 Thread rburnsj
: Josip Deanovic Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 7:53 AM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication On Wednesday 2016-12-14 07:39:36 rbur...@gmail.com wrote: > I have 7.4 Director and Windows Binaries. > No issues thus far. > Windo

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-14 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Wednesday 2016-12-14 07:39:36 rbur...@gmail.com wrote: > I have 7.4 Director and Windows Binaries. > No issues thus far. > Windows Server 2012 Deduplication and Previous Versions enabled Have you checked the size of the backup job and compared it with the compression ratio reported in the

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-14 Thread rburnsj
I have 7.4 Director and Windows Binaries. No issues thus far. Windows Server 2012 Deduplication and Previous Versions enabled Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Norbert Gomes Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 7:32 AM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-14 Thread Norbert Gomes
OK thank you for these precisions, we'll give it a try in next weeks (or months ?). Or if someone in this list has already tried ? :-) And for the other, has a workaround, disable Windows deduplication or you will get some surprises at restore ! Regards Norbert Norbert GOMES Le 14/12/2016

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
The Bacula version 5.2 Windows File daemon did not understand anything about the new Windows features (compression, deduplication, Unix style links, ...). However the File daemon has evolved significantly, and now Bacula *should* be aware of most all the new Windows stuff. Since I do not run

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-14 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Wednesday 2016-12-14 11:32:40 Raymond Burns Jr. wrote: > H... Why did you disable deduplication? I am backing up several > windows machines with it on. Check the quoted part of the first message. > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016, 5:20 AM Norbert Gomes > > wrote: > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-14 Thread Raymond Burns Jr.
H... Why did you disable deduplication? I am backing up several windows machines with it on. On Wed, Dec 14, 2016, 5:20 AM Norbert Gomes wrote: > Hello, > > I'm back with this post. > > To get reliabled backups, we have disabled the deduplication in the >

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-12-14 Thread Norbert Gomes
Hello, I'm back with this post. To get reliabled backups, we have disabled the deduplication in the Windows Servers. Is there another solution to correctly backup with Bacula Windows deduplicated servers ? Regards, Norbert Le 30/11/2016 à 11:44, Norbert Gomes a écrit : > Hi, > > We

[Bacula-users] Win2012 integrated deduplication

2016-11-30 Thread Norbert Gomes
Hi, We realize today that certain of our Windows backups are incomplete. The backup log returns OK, but the size of the backuped data is clearly not the size of the real data (7 GB backuped instead of 130 GB, with 20% compression) When we restore a full backup, a lot of files have a size of 0