Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2003 agent performance

2010-12-30 Thread Martin Simmons
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:10:26 -0800, Richard Amerman said: I'm having issues with the performance of the bacula agent, 5.0.3 32bit, on Win 2003 32bit installed cleanly in a Virtualbox VM with 4 procs and 3GB ram, with little in use. This machine uses very little cpu under normal load

[Bacula-users] Windows 2003 agent performance

2010-12-29 Thread Richard Amerman
I'm having issues with the performance of the bacula agent, 5.0.3 32bit, on Win 2003 32bit installed cleanly in a Virtualbox VM with 4 procs and 3GB ram, with little in use. This machine uses very little cpu under normal load but when a bacula backup starts up the cpu usage climes to 89%

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2003 agent performance

2010-12-29 Thread John Drescher
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Richard Amerman ramer...@roadmasterinc.com wrote: I'm having issues with the performance of the bacula agent, 5.0.3 32bit, on Win 2003 32bit installed cleanly in a Virtualbox VM with 4 procs and 3GB ram, with little in use. This machine uses very little cpu

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2003 agent performance

2010-12-29 Thread Richard Amerman
Definitely a good point. compression is not turned on though. This is a new system I set up in the past month and I have not enabled software compression anywhere and do not find any references to it in any of my config files. (for that matter I'm not sure if I have hardware compression

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2003 agent performance

2010-12-29 Thread James Harper
I'm having issues with the performance of the bacula agent, 5.0.3 32bit, on Win 2003 32bit installed cleanly in a Virtualbox VM with 4 procs and 3GB ram, with little in use. This machine uses very little cpu under normal load but when a bacula backup starts up the cpu usage climes to 89%