On 10/8/07, Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Flak Magnet wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 04 October 2007 11:27:04 am John Drescher wrote:
> >> Use the release command instead of unmount
> >>
> >> John
> >
> > Huh. I've written some scripts that do some slightly funky stuff to g
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Flak Magnet wrote:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 11:27:04 am John Drescher wrote:
>> Use the release command instead of unmount
>>
>> John
>
> Huh. I've written some scripts that do some slightly funky stuff to get
> around the "blocking" effect of doing an "umount" from bcons
> Huh. I've written some scripts that do some slightly funky stuff to get
> around the "blocking" effect of doing an "umount" from bconsole.
>
> So I wonder: Will the "release" command unload the tape, put it away and all
> that jazz?
>
It does that for me, well at least from version 2.0.X and ab
On Thursday 04 October 2007 11:27:04 am John Drescher wrote:
> Use the release command instead of unmount
>
> John
Huh. I've written some scripts that do some slightly funky stuff to get
around the "blocking" effect of doing an "umount" from bconsole.
So I wonder: Will the "release" command un
On 10/4/07, Bob Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I unmount a volume using the bconsole unmount command, bacula
> blocks access to the tape drive until I mount another volume. Is there
> a way to config it so the drive isn't blocked when a tape is unmounted
> from within bconsole? If I u
When I unmount a volume using the bconsole unmount command, bacula
blocks access to the tape drive until I mount another volume. Is there
a way to config it so the drive isn't blocked when a tape is unmounted
from within bconsole? If I unmount the tape drive I'd like it to be
able to grab an
