Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.2 sd bind to 0.0.0.0 and respond only to localhost

2010-05-13 Thread frank cheong
Dear Sean, Yes, I just figured out it is being caused by the iptable of the bacula server running the storage daemon. Actually the problem have been fixed by including a rule for 9103 access. Anyway, thx very much for your help indeed. Rgds, Frank On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Sean M Clark

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.2 sd bind to 0.0.0.0 and respond only to localhost

2010-05-12 Thread Sean M Clark
On 2010May12 2:42 AM, frank cheong wrote: > Dear All, > > I have just finished setting up bacula 5.0.2 and have no problem in > backing up local host, while it complained the following error when I > add a second client :- > > Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage daemon: server:9103 12-May >

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.2 sd bind to 0.0.0.0 and respond only to localhost

2010-05-12 Thread Josh Fisher
On 5/12/2010 3:42 AM, frank cheong wrote: > Dear All, > > I have just finished setting up bacula 5.0.2 and have no problem in > backing up local host, while it complained the following error when I > add a second client :- > > Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage daemon: server:9103 12-May >

[Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.2 sd bind to 0.0.0.0 and respond only to localhost

2010-05-12 Thread frank cheong
Dear All, I have just finished setting up bacula 5.0.2 and have no problem in backing up local host, while it complained the following error when I add a second client :- Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage daemon: server:9103 12-May 12:41 server-dir JobId 17: Fatal error: Bad response to S