Hi,
I'm still using bacula 3.0.3 on debian lenny (amd64). In the next
weeks I wanted to move on to 5.0.x. But due to the freeze of the next
debian stable release there will be no 5.0.3 in debian for some time.
5.0.3 seems to have a lot of importent bug fixes, so I'd like to skip
5.0.2 which is ava
On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still using bacula 3.0.3 on debian lenny (amd64). In the next
> weeks I wanted to move on to 5.0.x. But due to the freeze of the next
> debian stable release there will be no 5.0.3 in debian for some time.
> 5.0.3 seems to have
Rory Campbell-Lange schrieb:
> On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm still using bacula 3.0.3 on debian lenny (amd64). In the next
> > weeks I wanted to move on to 5.0.x. But due to the freeze of the next
> > debian stable release there will be no 5.0.3 in de
On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
> Rory Campbell-Lange schrieb:
> > On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
> > > ...so I'd like to skip 5.0.2 which is available in lenny-backports
> > > right now.
> > >
> > > Does anyone use an alternative bacula repositor
Rory Campbell-Lange writes:
> On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
>> Rory Campbell-Lange schrieb:
>> > On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
>> > > ...so I'd like to skip 5.0.2 which is available in lenny-backports
>> > > right now.
>> > >
>> > > Does anyon
On 14.09.2010 18:02, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
>> Thanks, I know this version from backports, and if there is no other
>> deb available, I'll give it a try.
>>
>> From http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=news (and from the mails I
>> received
Sven Hartge schrieb:
> On 14.09.2010 18:02, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > On 14/09/10, Ralf Gross (ralf-li...@ralfgross.de) wrote:
>
> >> Thanks, I know this version from backports, and if there is no other
> >> deb available, I'll give it a try.
> >>
> >> From http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=news
> Hi,
>
> I'm still using bacula 3.0.3 on debian lenny (amd64). In the next
> weeks I wanted to move on to 5.0.x. But due to the freeze of the next
> debian stable release there will be no 5.0.3 in debian for some time.
> 5.0.3 seems to have a lot of importent bug fixes, so I'd like to skip
> 5.0.
On 14/09/10, Tobias Brink (tobias.br...@gmail.com) wrote:
> You should also be careful with the 5.0.2-1 version if you use
> Postgres: it broke my database on upgrade. This is fixed in 5.0.2-2
> which is not (yet?) in the backports. See also
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5912
Am Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:41:04 +0200 schrieb Ralf Gross:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still using bacula 3.0.3 on debian lenny (amd64). In the next weeks
> I wanted to move on to 5.0.x. But due to the freeze of the next debian
> stable release there will be no 5.0.3 in debian for some time. 5.0.3
> seems to have
Thomas Mueller schrieb:
> Am Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:41:04 +0200 schrieb Ralf Gross:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm still using bacula 3.0.3 on debian lenny (amd64). In the next weeks
> > I wanted to move on to 5.0.x. But due to the freeze of the next debian
> > stable release there will be no 5.0.3 in debian
11 matches
Mail list logo
