Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-10 Thread Fahrer, Julian
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Paul Van Wambeke [mailto:paul.vanwamb...@br.fgov.be] > Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2012 17:15 > An: Fahrer, Julian > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 serv

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-10 Thread Paul Van Wambeke
rüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Paul Van Wambeke [mailto:paul.vanwamb...@br.fgov.be] >> Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2012 13:38 >> An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net; James Harper >> Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 >> MByte/sec tra

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-10 Thread Fahrer, Julian
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Paul Van Wambeke [mailto:paul.vanwamb...@br.fgov.be] > Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2012 13:38 > An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net; James Harper > Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 > MByte

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-10 Thread Paul Van Wambeke
On 6/09/2012 12:02, Paul Van Wambeke wrote: > On 5/09/2012 11:21, James Harper wrote: >>> Using iperf I measured following performances : >>> >>> bacula-fd = the windows server 2008 R2 host, 1Gb/sec NIC bacula-dir = a >>> linux >>> ubuntu 10.04 PC, 1 100Mb/sec NIC bacula-sd = a linux ubuntu 10.04

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-06 Thread Paul Van Wambeke
On 5/09/2012 11:21, James Harper wrote: >> Using iperf I measured following performances : >> >> bacula-fd = the windows server 2008 R2 host, 1Gb/sec NIC bacula-dir = a linux >> ubuntu 10.04 PC, 1 100Mb/sec NIC bacula-sd = a linux ubuntu 10.04 server, 1 >> Gbite/sec NIC >> >> >> iperf server

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-05 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Paul Van Wambeke : > On 5/09/2012 02:52, James Harper wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I have Bacula 5.01 Director installed on a Linux Ubuntu 10.04 server, and a >>> Bacula 5.2.10 Client (Bacula-fd) running on a Windows Server 2008 >>> R2 SP1 server, with Hyper-V role installed. Purpose is

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-05 Thread James Harper
> Using iperf I measured following performances : > > bacula-fd = the windows server 2008 R2 host, 1Gb/sec NIC bacula-dir = a linux > ubuntu 10.04 PC, 1 100Mb/sec NIC bacula-sd = a linux ubuntu 10.04 server, 1 > Gbite/sec NIC > > > iperf serveriperf clientPerformance

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-05 Thread Paul Van Wambeke
On 5/09/2012 02:52, James Harper wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have Bacula 5.01 Director installed on a Linux Ubuntu 10.04 server, and a >> Bacula 5.2.10 Client (Bacula-fd) running on a Windows Server 2008 >> R2 SP1 server, with Hyper-V role installed. Purpose is her to backup the host >> server, not

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-04 Thread James Harper
> Hi > > I have Bacula 5.01 Director installed on a Linux Ubuntu 10.04 server, and a > Bacula 5.2.10 Client (Bacula-fd) running on a Windows Server 2008 > R2 SP1 server, with Hyper-V role installed. Purpose is her to backup the host > server, not the virtual machines. > > Initially the backu

[Bacula-users] bacula 5.2.10 on Windows 2008 R2 server : 1 MByte/sec transfer rate, very slow

2012-09-04 Thread Paul Van Wambeke
Hi I have Bacula 5.01 Director installed on a Linux Ubuntu 10.04 server, and a Bacula 5.2.10 Client (Bacula-fd) running on a Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 server, with Hyper-V role installed. Purpose is her to backup the host server, not the virtual machines. Initially the backup transfer ra