In the message dated: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:15:53 -,
The pithy ruminations from Chris Ord on
<[Bacula-users] bacula possibly confused about label> were:
=> Dears,
=>
=> In the middle of a backup job bacula is asking for a tape it has labeled and
is registered corre
=> ctly
>
> John,
> that is the confusing part(see bold)
>
> Device "Drive_0" (/dev/nst0) open but no Bacula volume is currently mounted.
> Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume "VARCD003", <-waiting for
> tape
>Pool:ArcD
>Media type: LTO5
> Slot 4 is loaded in dri
> sorry I should have been a bit more specific,
> the tape is mounted, both bacula and mtx thinks it's mounted. Bacula doesn't
> think the tape is a bacula archive(it is).
>
I am not sure about bacula thinking the volume is mounted when the sd
says it is not mounted however could the write protec
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Chris Ord
wrote:
> Dears,
>
> In the middle of a backup job bacula is asking for a tape it has labeled and
> is registered correctly(I believe) in the database.
>
> Here's the relevant info
> Status gives me this:
>
> Running Jobs:
> Writing: Incremental Backup job
Dears,
In the middle of a backup job bacula is asking for a tape it has labeled and is
registered correctly(I believe) in the database.
Here's the relevant info
Status gives me this:
Running Jobs:
Writing: Incremental Backup job DailyArchive2 JobId=182 Volume="VARCD003"
pool="ArcD" device="
