Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill: that last block on the first tape ok or not?

2008-02-13 Thread K. M. Peterson
So, this is still somewhat interesting (to me, at least). Thanks to Dan for the suggestion! Swapping the two tapes used for btape fixed the problem. Swapping them back caused the problem to reappear. In the old days, I'd say that we had a bad tape. However, there aren't any errors logged by

Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill: that last block on the first tape ok or not?

2008-02-11 Thread Dan Langille
K. M. Peterson wrote: Hi all, New installation of Bacula, and I'm a new user; I apologize if there's something that I overlooked. Bacula is installed in testing mode on Open SUSE 10.2. Version is 2.2.8. The device is a Quantum SuperLoader3 with one DLT-S4 tape drive. I ran btape -

Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill: that last block on the first tape ok or not?

2008-02-11 Thread K. M. Peterson
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Dan Langille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: K. M. Peterson wrote: ... Error reading block: ERR=block.c:1008 Read zero bytes at 1180:0 on device Drive-1 (/dev/nst0). Have you tried a different tape as the second tape? Hi, No, I haven't. I only have two

Re: [Bacula-users] btape fill: that last block on the first tape ok or not?

2008-02-11 Thread John Drescher
I will skip the first question because there are two areas that do not make sense to me and I do not want to add to your confusion... Also, I'd presume that we'd want to have compression turned on - if anyone has a comment on that, I'd be appreciative. You want hardware compression (most

[Bacula-users] btape fill: that last block on the first tape ok or not?

2008-02-11 Thread K. M. Peterson
Hi all, New installation of Bacula, and I'm a new user; I apologize if there's something that I overlooked. Bacula is installed in testing mode on Open SUSE 10.2. Version is 2.2.8. The device is a Quantum SuperLoader3 with one DLT-S4 tape drive. I ran btape - test and it worked fine, and I