On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 00:45 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 08.11.2007 23:11,, Craig White wrote::
> ...
> >> Try it - I'm fairly sure Bacula will not add to this volume. If I'm
> >> wrong I'll have to re-think what I implemented some times now :-)
> >
> > I am trying it - that's why
Hi,
08.11.2007 22:05,, Craig White wrote::
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 23:05 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 02.11.2007 21:48,, Craig White wrote::
>>> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 21:38 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
02.11.2007 21:26,, Craig White wrote::
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 1
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 16:19 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> > Pool {
> > Name = ThursdayPool
> > Pool Type = Backup
> > Recycle = yes
> > AutoPrune = yes
> > Volume Retention = 19d
> > Volume Use Duration = 4d
> > Maximum Volume Jobs = 4
> > }
> >
> > Since 1_Friday_Week_3 was last writ
> Pool {
> Name = ThursdayPool
> Pool Type = Backup
> Recycle = yes
> AutoPrune = yes
> Volume Retention = 19d
> Volume Use Duration = 4d
> Maximum Volume Jobs = 4
> }
>
> Since 1_Friday_Week_3 was last written 2007-11-02 and more than 4d have
> passed, it's pretty clear that if Bacul
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 23:05 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 02.11.2007 21:48,, Craig White wrote::
> > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 21:38 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 02.11.2007 21:26,, Craig White wrote::
> >>> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:08 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
> On 11/2/
Hi,
02.11.2007 21:48,, Craig White wrote::
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 21:38 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 02.11.2007 21:26,, Craig White wrote::
>>> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:08 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
On 11/2/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a bit befuddled.
>>
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 21:38 +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 02.11.2007 21:26,, Craig White wrote::
> > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:08 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
> >> On 11/2/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I am a bit befuddled.
> >>>
> >>> I have a 'Full' backup which consists
Hi,
02.11.2007 21:26,, Craig White wrote::
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:08 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
>> On 11/2/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I am a bit befuddled.
>>>
>>> I have a 'Full' backup which consists of 4 jobs but it extends onto 2
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> the Pool permits 4 j
> I get that. I can't change the number to 2 because then it would stop
> after the second job and force me into a new tape leaving half the first
> tape filled and not enough room on second tape to complete the next 2
> jobs (the second being a standard BackupCatalog job).
>
> I find it hard to be
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:08 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
> On 11/2/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am a bit befuddled.
> >
> > I have a 'Full' backup which consists of 4 jobs but it extends onto 2
> > tapes.
> >
> > the Pool permits 4 jobs
> > Maximum Volume Jobs = 4
> > Volume
On 11/2/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a bit befuddled.
>
> I have a 'Full' backup which consists of 4 jobs but it extends onto 2
> tapes.
>
> the Pool permits 4 jobs
> Maximum Volume Jobs = 4
> Volume Retention = 19d
> Volume Use Duration = 4d
>
I believe "Maximum Volume J
I am a bit befuddled.
I have a 'Full' backup which consists of 4 jobs but it extends onto 2
tapes.
the Pool permits 4 jobs
Maximum Volume Jobs = 4
Volume Retention = 19d
Volume Use Duration = 4d
The first 2 1/2 jobs are written to the first tape and the status is
marked 'Full' - so far so
12 matches
Mail list logo
