-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Marc Cuypers wrote:
>
>> I'm asking this because backups without spooling are faster than those
>> with spooling. Is this normal?
>
> Yes - for a single job
>
> If you have multiple concurrent jobs running t
Hi,
On 3/25/2007 5:39 PM, Marc Cuypers wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> Thanks for answering.
>
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/24/2007 9:16 PM, Marc Cuypers wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm still using bacula 1.38.5.
>>>
>>> To prevent shoe shining (writing, rewinding, writing again) with a tape
>>> dri
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Marc Cuypers wrote:
> I'm asking this because backups without spooling are faster than those
> with spooling. Is this normal?
Yes - for a single job
If you have multiple concurrent jobs running the individual backups will
run as slow as a single backup, but because they wi
Hi Arno,
Thanks for answering.
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/24/2007 9:16 PM, Marc Cuypers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still using bacula 1.38.5.
>>
>> To prevent shoe shining (writing, rewinding, writing again) with a tape
>> drive bacula uses spooling.
> ...
>> The spooling to the file and th
Hi,
On 3/24/2007 9:16 PM, Marc Cuypers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still using bacula 1.38.5.
>
> To prevent shoe shining (writing, rewinding, writing again) with a tape
> drive bacula uses spooling.
...
> The spooling to the file and the writing to tape is not concurrent. Is
> there a reason for this
Hi,
I'm still using bacula 1.38.5.
To prevent shoe shining (writing, rewinding, writing again) with a tape
drive bacula uses spooling.
When using spooling, the data is first spooled to local disk file, then
it is written to tape (despooling). When there is more data to backup
then the maximum s
