Erich,
thanks for help anyway. I will be upgrading to v2 soon, hopefully this
will solve the problem.
Mantas
Erich Prinz wrote:
> I'm out of ideas.
>
> Norton posed a problem for quite a few people on the list some time
> ago (I can't recall the time frame.) Not sure of the specific fix, but
I'm out of ideas.
Norton posed a problem for quite a few people on the list some time
ago (I can't recall the time frame.) Not sure of the specific fix,
but excluding bacula-fd.exe is certainly one key element.
The output doesn't give me any clues either. Maybe check the AV and
see if that
Nod32.
Erich Prinz wrote:
> What Anti Virus package are you using?
>
> E
>
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT &
What Anti Virus package are you using?
E
On Jan 26, 2007, at 4:15 AM, Mantas M. wrote:
> I had bacula running in trace mode with debug set to 200. For
> brevity's sake i've stripped the
>
> klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:506 Send data to SD len=*
>
> lines from the trace.
>
> Please see attach
Threads within a thread - sigh.
Good idea from Alan to run the memtest. I bacula is the leading
indicator something more is wrong on the machine, I'd be thankful to
know before a meltdown!
The other thing to do is run the FD in trace mode to see where it
exits. That alone should yield valua
Onsdag 17 januar 2007 10:30 skrev Mantas M.:
> Alan Brown wrote:
> > Has anything else stopped running?
>
> No, except the bacula-fd the server is acting stable.
>
> > This might sound trite, but have you run memtest86+ on the hardware?
>
> Actually, i didn't. It never crossed my mind, that this mi
Alan Brown wrote:
> Has anything else stopped running?
No, except the bacula-fd the server is acting stable.
> This might sound trite, but have you run memtest86+ on the hardware?
Actually, i didn't. It never crossed my mind, that this might be a
hardware issue. Maybe i'm wrong but I guess it's
Hi,
As a matter of fact, I am using the "restart service" feature microsoft
kindly provided us ( I guess they saw the problems coming :-) ).
However, this doesnt seem to help much. My guess now is that the service
closes with exit code 0, so windows think that everything is the way it
should be
On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Mantas M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running bacula-fds (1.38.11) on a few W2k3 computers, on one of
> them
> the file daemon service is constantly crashing.
> I saw a similar problem discussed about a month ago, apparently the
> problem there was fd running on non Lo
On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Mantas M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running bacula-fds (1.38.11) on a few W2k3 computers, on one of
> them
> the file daemon service is constantly crashing.
> I saw a similar problem discussed about a month ago, apparently the
> problem there was fd running on non Lo
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Mantas M. wrote:
> Most of the time it works ok, but atleast once a week I come to work,
> and find that backups on that machine have failed, since the fd isn't
> running.
Has anything else stopped running?
> Anyone has any idea what might be the problem?
This might sound t
Hello,
I'm running bacula-fds (1.38.11) on a few W2k3 computers, on one of them
the file daemon service is constantly crashing.
I saw a similar problem discussed about a month ago, apparently the
problem there was fd running on non Local System account. This is not my
case, bacula-fd runs under
12 matches
Mail list logo
