On Tuesday 28 June 2005 23:35, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dan Langille wrote:
> > With a verify job, you set a base line against which future verifies
> > are compared. With log files, you are constantly getting new files,
> > especially if you include the date in the log file name.
> >
> > I t
Hi,
Dan Langille wrote:
With a verify job, you set a base line against which future verifies
are compared. With log files, you are constantly getting new files,
especially if you include the date in the log file name.
I think I may want a different verify job: one that compares the
volume
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Dan,
Dan Langille wrote:
I also want to get rid of it from the console... that's a lot of
messages!
... write a small daemon that checks the messages file and... no, only
joking.
Ok, after some test verify today I stop joking.
I had messages running through the co
Dan,
Dan Langille wrote:
Don't know, but if everything else fails write a small wrapper for bsmtp
which filters away all New file: lines - would be easy enough with grep,
sed, or perl or whtever you prefer...
Good idea.Trying that now.
I also want to get rid of it from the console... t
On 23 Jun 2005 at 22:00, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dan Langille wrote:
>
> ...
> > As you can see, the email message being composed was too large. I'm
> > quite sure this is a limitation imposed by my mail server
> > configuration. I do not want to alter that. I want to supress the
> >
Hi,
Dan Langille wrote:
...
As you can see, the email message being composed was too large. I'm
quite sure this is a limitation imposed by my mail server
configuration. I do not want to alter that. I want to supress the
'New file:' messages. I don't see anything related to 'new file' at
h
I know how to supress restore message using my messages resource:
console = all, !skipped, !saved, !restored
I was just doing a Verify job and this is the end of the output:
23-Jun 15:37 bacula-dir: New file: /home/dan/utils.sh
23-Jun 15:37 bacula-dir: New file: /home/dan/id
23-Jun 15:37 bacul
