Re: [Bacula-users] mobile client misses backup -> bacula should upgrade

2005-04-05 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: I wonder why when a mobile client misses e.g. its scheduled FULL backup bacula does not upgrade the next scheduled (DIFFERENTIAL/INCREMENTAL) backup to a FULL backup ? It does at runtime, but the scheduler shows it as diff/inc until the job is actually

Re: [Bacula-users] mobile client misses backup -> bacula should upgrade

2005-04-05 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:45 +0200, Ludovic Strappazon wrote: > Hi Soeren, > > I think the "Rerun Failed Levels" directive is what you need. Yes exactly ! Thank you very much !! Best, Soeren --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guid

Re: [Bacula-users] mobile client misses backup -> bacula should upgrade

2005-04-05 Thread Ludovic Strappazon
Hi Soeren, I think the "Rerun Failed Levels" directive is what you need. Rerun Failed Levels = If this directive is set to *yes* (default no), and Bacula detects that a previous job at a higher level (i.e. Full or Differential) has failed, the current job level will be upgraded to the hig

[Bacula-users] mobile client misses backup -> bacula should upgrade

2005-04-05 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
Hi all! I wonder why when a mobile client misses e.g. its scheduled FULL backup bacula does not upgrade the next scheduled (DIFFERENTIAL/INCREMENTAL) backup to a FULL backup ? Is the current behaviour intended or am I just too stupid to find the option allowing for 'mobile-client-auto-upgrades' ?