On 11/17/16 08:08, Paul J R wrote:
> I dont need a consistent full, any backup it manages to do is a plus.
> I've tried splitting it into multiple job sets but the way the dataset
> changes makes it fairly resistant cause the data changes its name as it
> gets older.
The data *changes its name
Hello,
This is an interesting problem, but it is outside the design of Bacula,
because Bacula assumes that you can always make a Full backup, then
thereafter, you can do things like Incremental Forever and Progressive
Virtual Full backups.
One thing you might try is using the "stop" command. I
On 11/16/2016 9:12 AM, Paul J R wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a data set that i'd like to backup thats large and not very
> important. Backing it up is a "nice to have" not a must have. I've been
> trying to find a way to back it up to disk that isnt disruptive to the
> normal flow of backups, but e
On Friday 2016-11-18 00:08:36 Paul J R wrote:
> I dont need a consistent full, any backup it manages to do is a plus.
> I've tried splitting it into multiple job sets but the way the dataset
> changes makes it fairly resistant cause the data changes its name as it
> gets older.
>
> Recovering the
On 17/11/16 07:26, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 11/16/16 09:12, Paul J R wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have a data set that i'd like to backup thats large and not very
>> important. Backing it up is a "nice to have" not a must have. I've been
>> trying to find a way to back it up to disk that isnt disru
On 2016-11-16 06:12 AM, Paul J R wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a data set that i'd like to backup thats large and not very
> important. Backing it up is a "nice to have" not a must have. I've been
> trying to find a way to back it up to disk that isnt disruptive to the
> normal flow of backups, but e
On 11/16/16 09:12, Paul J R wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a data set that i'd like to backup thats large and not very
> important. Backing it up is a "nice to have" not a must have. I've been
> trying to find a way to back it up to disk that isnt disruptive to the
> normal flow of backups, but ev
Hi All,
I have a data set that i'd like to backup thats large and not very
important. Backing it up is a "nice to have" not a must have. I've been
trying to find a way to back it up to disk that isnt disruptive to the
normal flow of backups, but everytime i end up in a place where bacula
wants
