2011/2/11 Jeremiah D. Jester :
> I’m trying to determine that status of some of my tapes and I’m a little
> confused on the output. Anyone have any insight?
>
>
>
> Thanks,JJ
>
>
>
> [root@scrappy bacula]# ./bin/btape -c bacula-sd.conf /dev/nst0
>
> Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes.
>
> btape:
> Thanks for the reply. These are new tapes. When I try to do a ‘label
> barcodes’ on the new tapes I get errors so I’ve been manually wiping them
> with the following commands.
>
Getting a read error on first usage on a new tape is expected and not
harmful at all. Just ignore the read error 0:0
: [Bacula-users] readlabel and btape
Op 11/02/2011 23:39, Jeremiah D. Jester schreef:
I'm trying to determine that status of some of my tapes and I'm a little
confused on the output. Anyone have any insight?
Thanks,JJ
[root@scrappy bacula]# ./bin/btape -c bacula-sd.conf /dev/nst0
Tape
Op 11/02/2011 23:39, Jeremiah D. Jester schreef:
I'm trying to determine that status of some of my tapes and I'm a
little confused on the output. Anyone have any insight?
Thanks,JJ
[root@scrappy bacula]# ./bin/btape -c bacula-sd.conf /dev/nst0
Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes.
btape: b
I'm trying to determine that status of some of my tapes and I'm a little
confused on the output. Anyone have any insight?
Thanks,JJ
[root@scrappy bacula]# ./bin/btape -c bacula-sd.conf /dev/nst0
Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes.
btape: butil.c:284 Using device: "/dev/nst0" for writing.
11-Fe
