Re: [Bacula-users] recycle: pruned volume vs scratch pool volume

2007-10-08 Thread John Drescher
On 10/8/07, Ralf Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Drescher schrieb: > > > sometimes I just can't follow the decision bacula takes about which > > > volume to > > > recycle (bacula 2.0.3 - update to 2.2.4 scheduled, debian etch, postgres > > > 8.1). > > > http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Au

Re: [Bacula-users] recycle: pruned volume vs scratch pool volume

2007-10-08 Thread Ralf Gross
John Drescher schrieb: > > sometimes I just can't follow the decision bacula takes about which volume > > to > > recycle (bacula 2.0.3 - update to 2.2.4 scheduled, debian etch, postgres > > 8.1). > > http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html#SECTION00253 > >

Re: [Bacula-users] recycle: pruned volume vs scratch pool volume

2007-10-08 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 07.10.2007 12:58,, Ralf Gross wrote:: > Hi, > > sometimes I just can't follow the decision bacula takes about which volume to > recycle (bacula 2.0.3 - update to 2.2.4 scheduled, debian etch, postgres > 8.1). Then you should first upgrade and then investigate further - there have been mod

[Bacula-users] recycle: pruned volume vs scratch pool volume

2007-10-07 Thread Ralf Gross
Hi, sometimes I just can't follow the decision bacula takes about which volume to recycle (bacula 2.0.3 - update to 2.2.4 scheduled, debian etch, postgres 8.1). http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html#SECTION00253 [...] # Try recycling any purged Volumes