Hi,
On 6/5/2007 2:31 AM, Bob Gamble wrote:
> One more thought on this. Has anyone tried changing the time stamp on a
> volume
You'd have to change the LastWritten column in the catalog. Bacula is
not very interested in the file system timestamps.
> (so bacula thinks it's retention period is
One more thought on this. Has anyone tried changing the time stamp on a
volume (so bacula thinks it's retention period is passed) and what affect
does this have in the big picture? In other words, would bacula get
confused by this?
I realize this wouldn't be best practices by any stretch. I'm
Well that clears pretty much all those questions up for me. Thanks very
much for the quick response.
On 5/29/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 5/29/2007 9:35 PM, Bob Gamble wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I first started using bacula about 5 months ago, I used one
> volume for every
Hi,
On 5/29/2007 9:35 PM, Bob Gamble wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I first started using bacula about 5 months ago, I used one
> volume for everything.
Oh. That's not really a good idea.
> All seemed to be fine until I realized how
> quickly I was going to use up the 2.5 terabytes. At the time, I
Hello,
When I first started using bacula about 5 months ago, I used one
volume for everything. All seemed to be fine until I realized how
quickly I was going to use up the 2.5 terabytes. At the time, I
wrongly assumed six months would pass and I would have plenty of space
after the volume was r
