Hi,
On 2/7/2006 9:51 PM, Ryan Sizemore wrote:
Arno,
Thanks for the response. I am not trying to say that bacula *should* use
a particular volume over another. My concern was that bacula was trying
to use a volume that was not in the changer.
Ok. I just wanted to point out that it's rather use
(GE Infrastructure)
Cc: Arno Lehmann; bacula users list
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem choosing tape from the scratch pool
Silas,
Yes, I have Accept Any Volume set to yes. I really dont care which
volume it wants, so long as the job isn't blocking becuase it wants a
tape that isnt i
Could_have_Many_More_Or_a_Few_less_Choices_here
>Select the Pool (1-5): # .
>Selection aborted, nothing done.
>
>
>Cheers,
>Silas Bennett
>
>=0)
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ryan
>Sizemore
>Sen
TECTED] Behalf Of Ryan
Sizemore
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 12:52 PM
To: Arno Lehmann
Cc: bacula users list
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem choosing tape from the scratch pool
Arno,
Thanks for the response. I am not trying to say that bacula *should* use
a particular volume over another
I believe Chris Schwerdt on the devel list has outlined the exact
problem with the post " find_next_volume_for_append algorithm issue".
Regards,
Ryan Sizemore
Ryan Sizemore wrote:
>Arno,
>
>Thanks for the response. I am not trying to say that bacula *should* use
>a particular volume over anothe
Arno,
Thanks for the response. I am not trying to say that bacula *should* use
a particular volume over another. My concern was that bacula was trying
to use a volume that was not in the changer. I have run update slots a
number of times, it it shows the correct information. Tapes 204 & 205
are in
Hi,
On 2/7/2006 6:57 PM, Ryan Sizemore wrote:
I am having a problem picking tapes from the scratch pool using an
autochanger. Here is exactly what is going on:
I have an autochanger with tapes 000200 - 000217 labeled in the Scratch
Pool. According to the bacula documentation, these tapes will b
