mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:04 PM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Tom Boyda
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Problems restoring large(?) files
>
> If you are using PostgreSQL, and it involves multiple tapes, and the
> tapes are
>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Problems restoring large(?) files
If you are using PostgreSQL, and it involves multiple tapes, and the
tapes are
not read back in the order that they were written, it is possible that
you
have run into a rather obscure bug.
That bug is fixed in 1.37.36, but the fix
t 24, 2005 3:04 PM
To: Tom Boyda
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Problems restoring large(?) files
Hi,
Tom Boyda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having a problem with bacula 1.37.30 and restoring large(?)
150MB+
> files. But it seems to be only some of
If you are using PostgreSQL, and it involves multiple tapes, and the tapes are
not read back in the order that they were written, it is possible that you
have run into a rather obscure bug.
That bug is fixed in 1.37.36, but the fix corrects a problem with writing the
JobMedia records, so it won
Hi,
Tom Boyda wrote:
Hello,
I am having a problem with bacula 1.37.30 and restoring large(?) 150MB+
files. But it seems to be only some of the files (see extract from the
log below) and the files were *not* being used, they are self-extracting
archives being stored for download.
I see no se
