Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Segmentation violation

2005-12-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 15:59, Roger Kvam wrote: > Now I`m really embarrassed, actually ,FreeBSD is protecting itself > against runaway processes by allowing maximum memory size for one > process to 512MB, I had to increase the maximum to 2 gig by adding > kern.maxdsiz=2147483648 to /boot/loa

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Segmentation violation

2005-12-14 Thread Attila Fülöp
Heigl Florian - Munich-MR - external wrote: Hi Roger, Now I`m really embarrassed, actually ,FreeBSD is protecting itself against runaway processes by allowing maximum memory size for one process to 512MB, I had to increase the maximum to 2 gig by adding kern.maxdsiz=2147483648 to /boot/loader

RE: [Bacula-users] Re: Segmentation violation

2005-12-14 Thread Heigl Florian - Munich-MR - external
Hi Roger, > Now I`m really embarrassed, actually ,FreeBSD is protecting itself > against runaway processes by allowing maximum memory size for one > process to 512MB, I had to increase the maximum to 2 gig by adding > kern.maxdsiz=2147483648 to /boot/loader.conf. witch is my physical > amount o

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Segmentation violation

2005-12-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I repeat what I said the last time: this looks like a MySQL problem. Given the new information you have presented, and the fact that you are having problems when working with almost 9 million files backed up (a lot), I would suspect that the problem is with your MySQL configuration. If

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: Segmentation violation

2005-12-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
This looks to me like a problem with MySQL. Did you by any chance load pre-built binaries rather than build on your system. My best guess at the moment is that Bacula is built with version X of MySQL and you are running with version Y on your machine. That means that some of the packet fields