My understanding is that design of such alternative courses to Ruhi, or
even
much more developments in this regard should be undertaken either by the
Institute Boards or under their direction, not by individual believers
independently. This will guarantee systematization required by the UHJ.
In a message dated 9/2/2004 10:32:00 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Therefore, I thoroughly recommend that such a consultation start with a thorough study of all the documents issued by the Universal House of Justice or the International Teaching Centre as from 1995.
Loni,
Hi, Max,
At 12:25 PM 9/2/2004, you wrote:
My understanding is that design of such alternative courses to Ruhi, or even much
more developments in this regard should be undertaken either by the Institute Boards
or under their direction, not by individual believers independently. This will
At 8:35 PM -0500 9/2/04, Mark A. Foster wrote:
Loni,
At 10:30 AM 9/2/2004, you wrote:
Therefore, I thoroughly recommend that such a consultation start with a
thorough study of all the documents issued by the Universal House of
Justice or the International Teaching Centre as from 1995.
Well, so
I'm interested, but have no time. I'm sure I'm not the only one. While
I have benefited from Ruhi, I certainly recognize the value of modifying
that curriculum and having alternate curricula that suit different
audiences, situations, or goals. The newest material for Junior Youth,
for example,
I am also interested; but I am also quite busy with existing projects.
My own take on the Ruhi approach, is that the House is more interested in instilling
the *methodology* than in the *content* of the Ruhi program. That is, the House
wanted to break two molds. One mold, the more important
