Re: Self-Definition

2005-09-11 Thread Rich Ater
I am always a Baha'i, always a sociologist, and always an individual. I have no problem simultaneously seeing an issue from various perspectives associated with each of these statuses. Mark, Of course you are. Upon rereading my response, it was churlish and I apologize. My point was

Re: al-ghars

2005-09-11 Thread Rich Ater
Mark A. Foster wrote: Richard, At 10:11 PM 9/10/2005, you wrote: Dr. Lawson translates (ana gharastu ashjaraha) to I have planted their trees. Does al-ghars refer to the tree or to the planting thereof or to both? Ghars (tree) is the singular of aghsan. al- is the definite

Re: al-ghars

2005-09-11 Thread Evolvinghuman
what is the connection between Ghusn and Aghsan?? Fariborz The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity

RE: Devastating stampede

2005-09-11 Thread Susan Maneck
The Revelation also says, Weigh not the Book of God with such standards and sciences as are current amongst you, for the Book itself is the unerring Balance established amongst men. (Baha'u'llah, The Kitab-i-Aqdas, p. 56) Dear Rich, You are taking the passage out of context. It is addressed

RE: al-ghars

2005-09-11 Thread Susan Maneck
I think he meant branch, not tree. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rich Ater Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 8:59 PM To: Baha'i Studies Subject: Re: al-ghars Mark A. Foster wrote: Richard, At 10:11 PM 9/10/2005, you wrote: Dr. Lawson

Re: Devastating stampede

2005-09-11 Thread Gilberto Simpson
On 9/11/05, Susan Maneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Revelation also says, Weigh not the Book of God with such standards and sciences as are current amongst you, for the Book itself is the unerring Balance established amongst men. (Baha'u'llah, The Kitab-i-Aqdas, p. 56) Dear Rich,

Re: al-ghars

2005-09-11 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
Thanks to the both of you, Rich and Mark. Richard. - Original Message - From: Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 7:58 PM Subject: Re: al-ghars Rich, At 08:58 PM 9/11/2005, you wrote: I'm confused here. The

RE: al-ghars

2005-09-11 Thread Mark A. Foster
Susan, At 09:40 PM 9/11/2005, you wrote: I think he meant branch, not tree. I just misread Wehr. Via moderna, Mark A. Foster . http://markfoster.net ... [a] word is ... a universal. - William of Ockham Structurization Tech: http://tech.structurization.com The information contained in

Mystified

2005-09-11 Thread Richard H. Gravelly
Dear Friends, I am now completely mystified. Following is the excerpt from Dr. Lawson's paper. It seems that, from the context, that ghars could also signify tree, or has been taken to signify tree. 19) Verily, verily I am the sapling - the glory with the most great truth, and am the

RE: Devastating stampede

2005-09-11 Thread Susan Maneck
Ok, so now that is confusing. What is being attributed to Islamic sciences which Bahais are saying not to do? Are you saying Bahais don't do tafsirs? (I thought the Bab and Abdul-Baha specifically wrote tafsirs, no? Dear Gilberto, The 'ulama are simply being told not to judge Baha'u'llah's