"The Revelation proclaimed by Bahá'u'lláh, His followers believe, is
divine in origin, all-embracing in scope, broad in its outlook,
scientific in its method, humanitarian in its principles and dynamic in
the influence it exerts on the hearts and minds of men. The mission of
the Founder of thei
Dear Richard,
The Guardian says nothing about requiring any demonstrations:
The Revelation proclaimed by Bahá'u'lláh, His followers believe, is
divine in origin, all-embracing in scope, broad in its outlook,
scientific in its method, humanitarian in its principles and dynamic in
the influence it
How does one scientifically demonstrate that the Revelation is "scientific
in its method?" I know of only two methods accepted by most scientists.
One is referred to as "the scientific method"; the other could be known as
"tracking" because it is used to study phenomena which cannot be controlled
This reminds me of a joke we say around these parts, when unable to cite a
source for a quote - it's attributed to the Kitab-i-Hearsay.
We don't take it seriously unless it's referenced and checked it ourselves
:)
On 1/15/07, M Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Read David Piff's Bahai Lore and
Read David Piff's Bahai Lore and then you can show and tell other Bahais
that they are repeating unfounded rumors. Almost anything another Bahai
could say but can't find is in there. Also remind Bahais that the
Guardian said the Faith was scientific in its method, so they should
either produc
I'm interested to hear if others have often have my experience. Often
someone will say the Baha'i Writings say something they do not. I then
suggest that the Baha'i Writings in fact say no such thing. They insist the
Baha'i Writings does. I'm like okay, but where? They don't know where but
