re: Protocol?

2009-06-15 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv david, :This must mean that the House would be... must?? really? could it mean that it is a private matter between the House and an individual and nobody else's anywhere on the face of the earth? could it mean that, as eer so often in the last 1.8 million

Re: Protocol?

2009-06-15 Thread firestorm
The Baha'i Studies Listserv sen :-) it evvver so frequently amuses me how u and i hit so much common ground from 160 or so degreesd apart. Kull'Ul'shay.Tawhidas i would most egregriously butcher the arabic. __ You are subscribed to

Re: Protocol?

2009-06-15 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv . Those who have already asked the UHJ, is it this? or is it that? have been told no, it's not that. I'm guessing that one of those who wrote and asked is it this? asked if it was because you were calling yourself a theologian.

Re: Protocol?

2009-06-15 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I've asked to be re-enrolled 3 times, and the answer was just a no: Sen, Did you ask the NSA of the Netherlands rather than the House of Justice? In so doing you were basically asking them to resend the decision of the House. I presume that if the UHJ wanted to

Persian IPW

2009-06-15 Thread Ahang Rabbani
The Baha'i Studies Listserv *Iran Press Watch* is happy to announce that its Persian page is launched! This page joins pages in English, French, German, and Spanish in bringing news and commentary on the situation of the Baha’is of Iran. We hope to provide through translation of English

Re: Protocol?

2009-06-15 Thread Matt Haase
The Baha'i Studies Listserv could it mean that it is a private matter between the House and an individual and nobody else's anywhere on the face of the earth? This is what I'm thinking. I mean, the impetus to make the decision is in the hands of the Universal House of Justice. And if it is not