Yes, I'd say cooperate also.
I'm not "academic", but I feel good in this forum, but please do not revolve persistently in the same topic.
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail") is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is
"Okay. Please calm down everyone. This thread, even by this alternate
subject heading , has been closed."
Ditto that. And we want the personal attacks to stop as well.
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail")
is sent by the Johnson County Community Co
Hi, folks,
Okay. Please calm down everyone. This thread, even by this alternate subject
heading , has been closed.
Mark A. Foster, Ph.D. * Prof. of Sociology * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johnson County Community College, Overland Park, Kansas
913-469-8500 x3376 * Fax 913-469-2589 * VOIP 347-983-0161
Mobi
Dear Susan,
Gilberto is hell bent on misrepresenting you, Khazeh, Scott, and others.
He is not going to stop doing that. It's just totally pointless to try to
reason with him because he has left his mind and reasoning power somewhere
in the 7th century on some desert.
Iskandar
On Fri, 28 Oct 2
Well, let's see: someone does a bank robbery somewhere. He is caught and
tried and incarcerated. I'd say that's appropriate nowadys, in this day
and age. Now, is it appropriate to cut off his hand? Gilberto avoids this
question and evades to give an answer. I think he knows that we understand
that
On 10/28/05, Hajir Moghaddam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gilberto:
> > So I would say that to *some* degree, human beings have *some*
> > capacity to tell right from wrong, apart from a specific text.
> Hajir:
> Makes sense. But it is more than just coincidence, to Baha'is, that all of
> these
Gilberto:
> So I would say that to *some* degree, human beings have *some*> capacity to tell right from wrong, apart from a specific text.Hajir:
Makes sense. But it is more than just coincidence, to Baha'is, that all of these changes in human thought (spirit of the age) took place around t
On 10/28/05, Hajir Moghaddam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gilberto:
> How do you define "appropriate"? I would suggest we come up with some
> specific moral principles, a set of criteria which makes sense, and
> which can be applied in different situations.
> Hajir:
> This is a great idea. The
Gilberto:
How do you define "appropriate"? I would suggest we come up with somespecific moral principles, a set of criteria which makes sense, andwhich can be applied in different situations.
Hajir:
This is a great idea. The only criteria and condition that makes sense is God Himself.
Gilberto: But you *are* presuming to talk about the teachings of at least oneprophet and call them barbaric, inappropriate, genocidal, out of date.
I don't think it is presumtuous to say "Hey killing folks who areminding their own business is generally wrong" or "stealing is a badthing to do"
[addressed to Scott]
> "How do you define "appropriate"? I would suggest we come up with some
> specific moral principles, a set of criteria which makes sense, and
> which can be applied in different situations."
Susan:
> We are neither prophets nor the sons of prophets that we should presume to
>
"But you *are* presuming to talk about the teachings of at least one
prophet and call them barbaric, inappropriate, genocidal, out of date."
The only thing which is true of the above statement is that I did suggest it
was out of date. And I suggest that on the basis of God's new revelation.
And mo
On 10/28/05, Susan Maneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "How do you define "appropriate"? I would suggest we come up with some
> specific moral principles, a set of criteria which makes sense, and
> which can be applied in different situations."
>
> We are neither prophets nor the sons of prophets t
"How do you define "appropriate"? I would suggest we come up with some
specific moral principles, a set of criteria which makes sense, and
which can be applied in different situations."
We are neither prophets nor the sons of prophets that we should presume to
do this.
The information conta
On 10/27/05, Scott Saylors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Afghanistan the courts of shar'iah routinely sentenced people to be
> stoned to death.
> Is this an appropriate sentence to this day and age?
How do you define "appropriate"? I would suggest we come up with some
specific moral principles,
15 matches
Mail list logo
