halo,
sangat bijaksana sekali. salut saya pada anda.
salam damai juga
michael
At 01:31 PM 7/16/04, you wrote:
Kenapa ya... kita lebih mengutamakan IDENTITAS Agama, daripada bagaimana
menjalankan ajaran2Nya... dalam hening... dalam diam. hanya
denganNya
Salam Damai...
--
July 16, 2004 11:26 AM
Subject: Re: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
dTalk'
> mbak veyna, coba tolong dilihat lagi reply-reply saya sebelumnya dan
> tanggapan2nyasaya sudah
"intan dima" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
> dTalk'
>
>
> > ngabis2in bytenya milister lain dengan kirim email yg ku
"Nur, Alam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:33 PM
> Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
> dTalk'
>
>
> mo nambahin nih.
> buka AURAT bagi wanita "Mu
SETUJU.ITULAH INDAHNYA KEBERSAMAAN
-Original Message-
From: Fanani, Mr. M. Firdaus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
dTalk'
Suda
-07-04 10:19 Subject:
AM RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan
LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea dTalk'
, 2004 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea dTalk'
ibu perhati yaa sama p'nur alam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 200
waduuuhhh.
klo pake tanda kutip jadinya saya ga brani ikutan deh...
;p
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Ka
|
|Subject:
|
| RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
ibu perhati yaa sama p'nur alam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
dTalk'
iya nih ka
o.
mandang aurat wanita yg bukan muhrim.HARAM juga lho.
MEROKOK...juga bisa haram lho...kalo dgn merokok si perokok bisa
isdead.:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [bal
okey...saya setuju dgn pak irfan nih.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus
'Brea dTalk'
Jadi kepancing
]
Subject: Re: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus
'Brea dTalk'
Jadi kepancing juga nich, :-))
Kalau sdh pasti haram ya haram bu. Halal ya halal. Nah kalo yg relatif itu
brarti Syubhat . Kalo Syubhat berarti ragu2 dan jgn sekali2 didekati
apalagi dibeli.
Rgrd
---
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 Juli 2004 17:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus
'Brea dTalk'
Jadi kepancing juga nich, :-))
Kalau sdh pasti haram ya haram bu. Halal ya halal. Nah kalo yg r
press
kembali ke acara balita yah he..he..he...
Rgrds,
Lilis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 Juli 2004 17:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus
'Brea dTalk'
Jadi kepancing
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
dTalk'
>jadi, haram itu relatif kan pak, bu kita disini generalis kok... bukan
--
nita yg bukan muhrim.HARAM juga lho.
MEROKOK...juga bisa haram lho...kalo dgn merokok si perokok bisa
isdead.:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelas
he...he
-Original Message-
From: sofie_w [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus
'Brea dTalk'
Cuman ngambil postingnya Pak.. moso gak tau..
At 04:26 PM 7/1
ate: Thursday, July 15, 2004 2:51 PM
Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
dTalk'
>Betul mba Siska,
>Orang juga pasti tau kalo yang haram itu juga sudah pasti tidak bakalan
>membawa kebaikan baik jasmani d
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
dTalk'
ya udah Pak, ngga usah diperpanjang, Toh mengenai Haram & Halal itu tinggal
pribadi masing2. Kalo tahu itu haram ya... ngga usah makan, Lha kok repot.
Titik . Konsumen yang berpendidikan kan harus s
ibu ko abis "Titik" masih ada terusannya?
-Original Message-
From: SETYOWATI, Siska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
dTalk'
ya udah
ya udah Pak, ngga usah diperpanjang, Toh mengenai Haram & Halal itu tinggal
pribadi masing2. Kalo tahu itu haram ya... ngga usah makan, Lha kok repot.
Titik . Konsumen yang berpendidikan kan harus selektif. Betul ngga ? kalo
ngga yakin juga ... ya beli aja Bread2 yang lain
-
up 2 ibu...
ga ada yg ngelarang ko...
tp klo di agama saya, klo makan yg haram maka ntar di akhirat makannya bara
api yg ga ada abisnya
apalagi klo tau itu haram...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July
|
|Subject:
|
| RE: [balita-anda] OOT : Penjelasan LPPOM MUI tentang Kasus 'Brea
24 matches
Mail list logo
