[BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2011-11-15 Thread Saager Mhatre
http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Considering there's been a spate of similar incidents, I figured it might just be valuable to collect all these references into a thread of their own. - d PS- If I had a nickel for every time I've wanted to point people to this article, I'd be a ric

[BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-03 Thread Kushal Das
Good old presentation [1] from mbuf. Please take time to read and understand. [1] http://www.shakthimaan.com/downloads/glv/presentations/mailing-list-etiquette.pdf Kushal -- CPython Core Developer http://fedoraproject.org http://kushaldas.in ___ BangP

[BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Rajiv Subramanian M
Good one! Thanks for sharing. -- Rajiv M Software Engineer. *DoubleSpring Media (P) Ltd.* #15/1 Robertson Road, Frazer Town, Bangalore 05, IND. Office: +91-80-40917126, Mobile: +91 7411 129611, Skype: rajiv.m1991 , Web: www.doublespring.com.

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Jeffrey Jose
I agree with almost all of it, except for these 2. 1. No HTML emails 2. No attachments. These are surely relics from the past. I dont see any reason why these need to be valid anymore. If your answer to this is "my favorite ncurses client cant read it" it doesnt count. -jeff On Mon, Aug 4, 201

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Noufal Ibrahim KV
On Mon, Aug 04 2014, Jeffrey Jose wrote: > I agree with almost all of it, except for these 2. > > 1. No HTML emails I don't like HTML emails because usual textual matter doesn't need it. It simply bloats things and if the renderer your client is using doesn't have some feature that the sender use

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Kushal Das
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jeffrey Jose wrote: > I agree with almost all of it, except for these 2. > > 1. No HTML emails > 2. No attachments. > Most of the FOSS project mailing lists follow these simple rules. > These are surely relics from the past. I dont see any reason why these need > t

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Anand Chitipothu
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Noufal Ibrahim KV wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04 2014, Jeffrey Jose wrote: > > > I agree with almost all of it, except for these 2. > > > > 1. No HTML emails > > I don't like HTML emails because usual textual matter doesn't need > it. It simply bloats things and if the re

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Jeffrey Jose
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Noufal Ibrahim KV > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 04 2014, Jeffrey Jose wrote: >> >> > I agree with almost all of it, except for these 2. >> > >> > 1. No HTML emails >> >> I don't like HTML emails because usual

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Jeffrey Jose
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Noufal Ibrahim KV wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04 2014, Jeffrey Jose wrote: > > > I agree with almost all of it, except for these 2. > > > > 1. No HTML emails > > I don't like HTML emails because usual textual matter doesn't need > it. It simply bloats things and if the re

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Jeffrey Jose
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Noufal Ibrahim KV > wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 04 2014, Jeffrey Jose wrote: >> >> > I agree with almost all of it, except for these 2. >> > >> > 1. No HTML emails >> >> I don't like HTML emails because usual

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Anand Chitipothu
> > Not only that, it is a pain to download something and open it in some >> application just to know what is inside. It is a lot better to send a link >> instead of sending attachments. >> > > ​Anand, how do you consume your emails? I get my emails on my phones as > well, in gmail, which has a pre

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Saager Mhatre
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Anand Chitipothu wrote: > > > > Not only that, it is a pain to download something and open it in some > >> application just to know what is inside. It is a lot better to send a > link > >> instead of sending attachments. > >> > > > > ​Anand, how do you consume your

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-04 Thread Balachandran Sivakumar
Hi Jeff, On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jeffrey Jose wrote: > I agree with almost all of it, except for these 2. > > 1. No HTML emails I generally look at it from this perspective - Do we really need HTML to convey something ? Are plain words not sufficient enough to express ourselves ?

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-05 Thread Abhishek L
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Balachandran Sivakumar wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > I generally look at it from this perspective - Do we really > need HTML to convey something ? Are plain words not sufficient enough > to express ourselves ? Look at it as "Simple is better than complex" > :) Ag

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-07 Thread Noufal Ibrahim KV
On Mon, Aug 04 2014, Jeffrey Jose wrote: [...] > ​I'm curious how do you read your mails? Noufal, if my memory serves me > right you're an emacs person. So emacs perhaps? > > I'm in the vim camp, so I use my browser for email.​ I download my email when I'm online and read them using either mutt

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-07 Thread Saager Mhatre
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Noufal Ibrahim KV wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04 2014, Jeffrey Jose wrote: > [...] > > >> ​.. and since I use browser, I appreciate an email that's nicely > > formatted. Yes, that includes contextual information with embedded > > images.​ > > Fair enough. However, large

Re: [BangPypers] Mailing list etiquette

2014-08-08 Thread Noufal Ibrahim
On 2014-08-08 11:40, Saager Mhatre wrote: [..] Didn't we already have this discussion on this list? Besides, doesn't mailman let us set a limit on the attachment size? One configuration to rule them all! Not that I recall. Even so, it's not just the size of the attachment but that multiplied b