Hi,
I have been not receiving mails on barebox@lists.infradead.org since 2
months: Is Barebox list always living??
Regards,
Lionel
___
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
Hello.
Tue, 29 May 2012 09:35:57 +0200 от Lionel Fiat lionel.f...@cloudseas.com:
Hi,
I have been not receiving mails on barebox@lists.infradead.org since 2 months:
Is Barebox list always living??
Regards,
LionelYes, you can view web archive for check this:
Hi Lionel,
Le Tue, 29 May 2012 09:35:57 +0200,
Lionel Fiat lionel.f...@cloudseas.com a écrit :
I have been not receiving mails on barebox@lists.infradead.org since 2
months: Is Barebox list always living??
it is :
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/barebox/2012-May/date.html
Eric
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:12:35PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 03:57:13PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com
---
.../arm/boards/at91sam9m10g45ek/env/bin/boot_board |2 +
commands/menu.c| 15 +-
Hi Sascha,
Le Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:26:06 +0100,
Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Sascha,
Le 13/12/2011 10:48, Sascha Hauer a écrit :
Sometimes it helps to enable
CONFIG_KALLSYMS
CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND
to
Hi Eric
http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=barebox.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/boards/eukrea_cpuimx27/eukrea_cpuimx27.c;h=63e87c9551c440edab572f5252a503ba4d533161;hb=c48de4beee21c3a5573cec084123c33ae08f6f7a
Now that piece certainly was missing, but how the heck did you find out
those register
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:06:00AM +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote:
Hi Eric
http://git.pengutronix.de/?p=barebox.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/boards/eukrea_cpuimx27/eukrea_cpuimx27.c;h=63e87c9551c440edab572f5252a503ba4d533161;hb=c48de4beee21c3a5573cec084123c33ae08f6f7a
Now that piece
Hi
Barebox barfs if I try to copy a file inside a mounted MMC fat partition.
Steps to reproduce:
1.) Load barebox (configured as internal boot MMC) as a second stage boot
loader from uboot.
2.) Mount MMC fat partition
3.) Try to copy file to the same partition
This results in this nice BUG():
Hi Sascha
you need the reference manual of the i.MX25 to know the meaning of
these registers and the datasheet of your flash to know it's timings
then you can calculate the value to put in the registers.
I have found them in an old uboot tree a previous person patched to have
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/configs/toshiba_ac100_defconfig | 39 ++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/toshiba_ac100_defconfig
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/toshiba_ac100_defconfig
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c
b/arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c
index e3a5eba..f2b134c 100644
---
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:49:24AM +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote:
Hi
Barebox barfs if I try to copy a file inside a mounted MMC fat partition.
Steps to reproduce:
1.) Load barebox (configured as internal boot MMC) as a second stage boot
loader from uboot.
2.) Mount MMC fat partition
3.)
On 10:30 Tue 29 May , Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:12:35PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:37:20PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
On 10:30 Tue 29 May , Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:12:35PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
Le Tue, 29 May 2012 10:48:44 +0200,
Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com a écrit :
here is the full trace.
There is something strange as it seems a wrong value gets loaded into R3
leading to the error.
and to be complete :
commenting out
printf(%c\b, spinchr[spin++ % (sizeof(spinchr)
On 10:35 Tue 29 May , Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 03:57:13PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com
---
.../arm/boards/at91sam9m10g45ek/env/bin/boot_board |2 +
commands/menu.c
G'day
sid1-noah:/ mount /dev/disk0.0 fat /mnt
block_cache: blk-ops-read returned 0
sid1-noah:/ cp /mnt/coblock_cache: blk-ops-read returned 0
nsole_image.jffs2 /mnt/console_image.jffs2-backup
block_cache: blk-ops-read returned 0
block_cache: blk-ops-read returned 0
block_cache:
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c
b/arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c
index e3a5eba..d933146 100644
---
Hello,
Currently i'm working on our new board, equipped with a imx287 processor,
using the 'karo-tx28' and 'freescale-mx28-evk' bsp as reference for our
own bsp.
But I can't find sdram initialisation, lowlevel routines, or dcd support
for imx28.
So i'm wondering how and where this is done
More information ...
I am pretty sure we need to switch to 1BIT transfer and/or using the
SDHCI_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL
quirk. I'll try to find out if I can add this functionality to barebox,
unless you believe there's something else which causes this behaviour.
I'll keep investigating ...
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 02:11:34PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/toshiba-ac100/board.c
On 12:42 Tue 29 May , Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:37:20PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
On 10:30 Tue 29 May , Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:12:35PM +0400, Antony Pavlov wrote:
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:52:36PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
btw I think we need to change the auto allocated dev_id to -2 so -1 one
have
the same meanning as in the kernel
I think we still have hardcoded -1 around.
I check normally no
Just grep for
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:48:44AM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Sascha,
I really want to believe this, but I wouldn't be so sure. I think
it's more likely that you found a bug in barebox that your new
toolchain happens to trigger. Could you provide the objdump of
show_progress along
Hello.
I'm trying to use barebox (current git version) with a Freescale
i.MX6q based board. The board is similar to Armadillo 2, but it comes
with another Ethernet PHY. Barebox starts on the board, and there is a
fec_imx0:
barebox@Freescale i.MX6q myboard:/ devinfo fec_imx0
resources:
num : 0
Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov antonynpav...@gmail.com
---
drivers/video/s3c24xx.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/s3c24xx.c b/drivers/video/s3c24xx.c
index 564ccbd..5d5d8f6 100644
--- a/drivers/video/s3c24xx.c
+++ b/drivers/video/s3c24xx.c
@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:47:36PM +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote:
G'day
Data Write Failed in PIO Mode.imx-esdhc@imx-esdhc0: timeout 2
imx-esdhc@imx-esdhc0: timeout 1
imx-esdhc@imx-esdhc0: timeout 1
imx-esdhc@imx-esdhc0: timeout 1
block_cache: blk-ops-read returned -110
Ok, so your
It does not necessarily means a bug when block_get fails here,
this can also be a failure on the underlying device.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
common/block.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/common/block.c b/common/block.c
index
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
common/block.c | 26 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/block.c b/common/block.c
index 4253fc4..437dc95 100644
--- a/common/block.c
+++ b/common/block.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:57:38PM +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote:
Hi
Data Write Failed in PIO Mode.imx-esdhc@imx-esdhc0: timeout 2
imx-esdhc@imx-esdhc0: timeout 1
imx-esdhc@imx-esdhc0: timeout 1
imx-esdhc@imx-esdhc0: timeout 1
block_cache: blk-ops-read returned -110
Ok, so your
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:14:52PM +0200, Roberto Nibali wrote:
ADDENDUM:
diff --git a/arch/arm/boards/fq-sid1-mx25-noah/Makefile
b/arch/arm/boards/fq-sid1-mx25-noah/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000..1e9cd54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boards/fq-sid1-mx25-noah/Makefile
@@
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:37:47PM +0300, Maxim Gorbachyov wrote:
Hello.
I'm trying to use barebox (current git version) with a Freescale
i.MX6q based board. The board is similar to Armadillo 2, but it comes
with another Ethernet PHY. Barebox starts on the board, and there is a
fec_imx0:
33 matches
Mail list logo