[PATCH v2] Add support for Voipac X53-DMM-668 module

2013-10-08 Thread Rostislav Lisovy
This patchset adds support for Voipac X53-DMM-668 module equipped with i.mx53 CPU. More info about the module may be found at: http://www.voipac.com/#X53-DMM-668 The board specific code enables UART0, NAND flash, Ethernet. Changes since v1: Use gpio_request() Use already defined VMX53 MACH_TY

[PATCH] i.MX53: vmx53: Add support for Voipac X53-DMM-668 (aka vmx53) module

2013-10-08 Thread Rostislav Lisovy
Signed-off-by: Rostislav Lisovy create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/freescale-mx53-vmx53/Makefile create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/freescale-mx53-vmx53/board.c create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/freescale-mx53-vmx53/env/config create mode 100644 arch/arm/boards/freescale-mx53-vmx53/flash_hea

Re: /dev/disk0 vs /dev/mmc0

2013-10-08 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 16:49 +0200 schrieb David Jander: [...] > > For DRAM clock scaling, only the clock divider or PLL should ever be > changed. Any other parameters should stay the same. If this has really been > done, I'd like to see it... > DRAM calibration settings have to do with sign

Re: /dev/disk0 vs /dev/mmc0

2013-10-08 Thread David Jander
On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:11:16 +0200 Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 15:47 +0200 schrieb David Jander: > > Dear Lucas, > > > > On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:39:24 +0200 > > Lucas Stach wrote: > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 11:13 +0200 schrieb David Jander: > > > [...] > > > >

Re: /dev/disk0 vs /dev/mmc0

2013-10-08 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 15:47 +0200 schrieb David Jander: > Dear Lucas, > > On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:39:24 +0200 > Lucas Stach wrote: > > > Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 11:13 +0200 schrieb David Jander: > > [...] > > > > > You are right. Sorry for the confusion. There were aliases in > > > >

Re: /dev/disk0 vs /dev/mmc0

2013-10-08 Thread David Jander
Dear Lucas, On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:39:24 +0200 Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 11:13 +0200 schrieb David Jander: > [...] > > > > You are right. Sorry for the confusion. There were aliases in barebox's > > > > version of imx53.dtsi which went missing somehow in my tree. I have

Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] add bpkfs support

2013-10-08 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 13:34 Sun 06 Oct , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:59:57AM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > v2 update comment and fix comment typo > > and rebase next > > > > The following changes since commit 705dbd7c795bbdfb448e1d0ace89d98cbceaae

Re: /dev/disk0 vs /dev/mmc0

2013-10-08 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 11:13 +0200 schrieb David Jander: [...] > > > You are right. Sorry for the confusion. There were aliases in barebox's > > > version of imx53.dtsi which went missing somehow in my tree. I have been > > > merging stuff from mainline Linux > > > That leads me to the qu

Re: /dev/disk0 vs /dev/mmc0

2013-10-08 Thread David Jander
On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:45:05 +0200 Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 09:02 +0200 schrieb David Jander: > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:19:36 +0200 > > Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:57:35AM +0200, David Jander wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:41:11 +0200

Re: /dev/disk0 vs /dev/mmc0

2013-10-08 Thread Lucas Stach
Am Dienstag, den 08.10.2013, 09:02 +0200 schrieb David Jander: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:19:36 +0200 > Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:57:35AM +0200, David Jander wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:41:11 +0200 > > > Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08

Re: /dev/disk0 vs /dev/mmc0

2013-10-08 Thread David Jander
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:19:36 +0200 Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:57:35AM +0200, David Jander wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 08:41:11 +0200 > > Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:32:03AM +0200, David Jander wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Sascha, > > > > > >